Reference Method for Source Testing: Quantification of Carbon Dioxide Releases by Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems from Thermal Power Generation

| Back |

Table 3 Certification Performance Specifications

Parameter Component Level Specification References
Specifi-cations Test Procedures
24-hour calibration drift CO2 (or O2) analyzer Low level (0–20% FS)
Mid level (40–60% FS)
High level (80–100% FS)
≤0.5% CO2 (or O2)
≤0.5% CO2 (or O2)
≤0.5% CO2 (or O2)
5.1.2 5.3.2
Stack gas moisture monitor* – wet O2 /Temp./relative humidity (RH) type Low level (0–20% FS)
High level (80–100% FS)
≤0.5% O2
≤0.5% O2
Flow monitor with system calibration capability Low level (0–20% FS)
High level (80–100% FS)
≤ the greater of
3.0% FS or 0.6 m/s absolute difference
3.0% FS or 0.6 m/s absolute difference
Flow monitor without system calibration capability Electronic reference level ≤3.0% FS 6.2.2  
System response time Dedicated analyzer ≤200 seconds for 90% change 5.1.3 5.3.3
Time-shared system ≤15 minutes for 90% change
Relative accuracy (RA) CO2 (or O2) analyzer Representative load level ≤ the greater of 10.0% RA or 0.5% CO2 (or O2) avg. absolute difference 5.1.4 5.3.4
Stack gas moisture monitor* Minimum safe and stable load level
Mid load (40–60%)
High load (90–100%)
≤ the greater of
10.0% RA or 2.0% of (100 - Bws) avg. absolute difference
10.0% RA or 2.0% of (100 - Bws) avg. absolute difference
10.0% RA or 2.0% of (100 - Bws) avg. absolute difference
Flow monitor Minimum safe and stable load level
Mid load level (40–60%)
High load level (90–100%)
≤ the greater of
10.0% RA or 0.6 m/s avg. absolute difference
10.0% RA or 0.6 m/s avg. absolute difference
10.0% RA or 0.6 m/s avg. absolute difference
CO2 mass emission Representative load level ≤10.0% RA
Bias CO2 (or O2) analyzer Representative load level ≤ the greater of 5.0% of FS value or 0.5% CO2 (or O2) avg absolute difference 5.1.5 5.3.5
Stack gas moisture monitor* Representative load level ≤ the greater of 5.0% FS or 1.0% of (100  - Bws) avg absolute difference
Flow monitor Representative load level ≤ the greater of 5.0% of FS value or 0.6 m/s avg. absolute difference

Notes: * The performance specifications for stack gas moisture based on wet O2 measurements (calibration drift, response time, relative accuracy, and availability) are summarized in Table 3 and Table 5. Other moisture monitoring systems may be used to correct dry measured concentrations, if it is demonstrated that the system is able to calculate the hourly factor (100 - Bws) with an error ≤2.0% all year round. Note that Bws is the moisture content of the stack gas (in % of volume).