Knowledge Translation and Brokering: Building Awareness through Dialogue
Connecting science to policy is an essential function of any science-based organization seeking to ensure a meaningful impact on policies, decisions and programs. Many Canadian science-based federal departments and agencies generate or transfer scientific information as a key component of their mandate. Over time, they have developed valuable strategies and tools for packaging and presenting science information so that it is accessible to and understood by policy and program users. Whether the science in question is related to the environment, human health or some other discipline, the priorities established and tools employed are often transferable from one field to another. Many important lessons can be learned through shared dialogue on the various knowledge translation and brokering initiatives employed by federal departments and agencies. Beyond the Canadian federal government, experiences and challenges in strengthening science-policy integration are similar amongst academia, industry and other levels of government, both in Canada and internationally; thus, the lessons learned and best practices developed are broadly applicable.
What is Knowledge Translation and Knowledge Brokering?
Knowledge Translation (KT) is an activity that packages science information to the preferences, channels and timescales of a given audience. Knowledge Brokering (KB) is where an intermediary (whether an individual or a specialized group) actively links the producers and users of knowledge to strengthen generation, dissemination and eventual use of that knowledge. There are analogous and related terms, such as Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Mobilization, Knowledge Exchange, among others.
Environment Canada’s Science and Technology Liaison is uniquely positioned as a knowledge translation and brokering unit. The unit focuses on customizing and targeting science knowledge to improve uptake by the target audience; and on developing mechanisms for sustained interaction between science and policy/program communities to help users inform the research agenda.
Recognizing the growing number of federal government employees engaged in knowledge translation and brokering, Environment Canada’s Science and Technology Liaison realized much could be learned from a discussion of this growing field. An interdepartmental dialogue would connect an active but disparate federal community and provide a platform to share ideas, address common goals and concerns, and engage in inspired discussion on moving forward on shared goals. Science and Technology Liaison sought to bring together a group of individuals positioned as knowledge translators and/or brokers who would benefit from participating in a collaborative event. To ensure the correct individuals were identified the invitation posed the following questions: are you one of a small group with a mixed skill set; working at the interface of science and policy; robustly writing, but not for the media, youth, or the public?
The invitation elicited an enthusiastic response with over 70 (of approximately 100) federal employees invited expressing interest to attend an interdepartmental meeting or to otherwise be kept informed.
Dialogue Goal: Improve recognition, support and application of Knowledge Translation and Brokering within the federal government
An Interdepartmental Dialogue
On September 30, 2009, Science and Technology Liaison welcomed over forty participants from thirteen federal departments and agencies to a two-day Interdepartmental Dialogue on Knowledge Translation and Knowledge Brokering hosted at the Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
The thirteen federal departments and agencies brought valuable multi-sectoral expertise and ideas to the Dialogue. With participants representing policy and program researchers and analysts, science advisors, knowledge managers and staff engaged in strategic science and technology liaison, discussion benefited from a broad spectrum of perspectives and experiences. Throughout the entire meeting, participants maintained an open dialogue that allowed all voices to be heard and captured all ideas and expectations. With the assistance of a skilled facilitator, participants devoted their efforts to compiling practical ideas, sharing best practices, and generating a list of priority items to advance a common agenda.
Finding Common Ground
To seed the discussion on advancing knowledge translation and brokering (KT-KB) in the federal government, participants were asked to provide statements prior to the meeting about which KT-KB activities within their organizations should be stopped, started, or maintained, with examples of current or proposed KT-KB activities (either individually or at a departmental/agency level). Commonalities across departments and professions quickly emerged during the session and these became the basis of the discussion.
Activities to Start or Maintain
- Focus on doing while keeping it simple and practical
- Build a Community of Practice (federal government, and national and international)
- Legitimize KT-KB – information technology is not the only solution
- Integrate KT-KB into program design
- Incorporate the “tacit” (experiential) knowledge component of KT-KB
- Develop a suite of KT-KB products and tools that can be used broadly
- Enhance communication between science and policy
- Use performance metrics to assess the impact of KT-KB
- Establish knowledge transfer centres
- Train staff and colleagues
Activities to Stop
- Misclassification of KT-KB personnel
- Focusing on terminology instead of shared learning and action
- Working in silos (isolation)
- Focusing efforts on disseminating knowledge “after the fact”
- Initiating activities and products without an identified target audience and the resources to support KT-KB
- Discounting grey literature
- Creating independent databases that have limited accessibility
- Assuming that information technology tools (wikis, portals) are the primary solutions to a science and policy interface
To establish discussion priorities among the diverse group it was necessary to identify criteria against which potential topics could be assessed. The criteria developed included the degree to which the topic has impact, is realistic, measurable, inspiring and visionary, and has an identifiable beneficiary (who’s my who).
The top five priorities emerged as follows:
- Establish a Community of Practice (COP)
- Create a suite of products and tools
- Develop a strategy for KT-KB
- Maintain performance metrics to evaluate success
- Elements of a KT-KB program design
Small groups discussed the tangible steps required to move each of the five priorities forward, such as funding, involvement of key players, infrastructure, performance measures, and time frame. Discussion highlights are summarized below for each of the five priorities.
1. Establish a Community of Practice (COP) as a forum for federal employees working in the KT-KB field to discuss priority issues across departments. Discussion focused on what would be needed to support development of a COP including:
- Delineating the role and objectives of the COP
- Determining how membership in the COP would be decided
- Deciding how the COP would be promoted interdepartmentally
- Creating commitment and engagement at a high level within departments and agencies
- Outlining how members would participate (e.g., electronic, face-to-face)
- Determining whether the required tools and support are already in existence or if something additional is required
2. Create a suite of the products and tools already used within the Government of Canada to raise awareness and accessibility amongst the various departments and agencies. Discussion focused on tools such as newsletters, websites, wikis, webinars and various face-to-face methods. Discussions also touched on how to create tangible tools with wide-ranging applicability and how to deal with barriers that may exist in developing various tools within federal government parameters.
3. Develop a strategy for KT-KB to increase the use, exposure and credibility of KT-KB within federal departments and agencies. Discussion points included defining objectives for the field; determining priorities, gaps and successes; promoting KT-KB to key audiences, such as senior management; considering human resource structures and issues; and developing mechanisms for ongoing learning in the field.
4. Maintaining performance metrics to evaluate success was of interest as staff are often required to report on how the work they are undertaking is having an impact. Questions of how success would be defined and what would be measured dominated the discussion. Possible metrics included web hits, numbers of publications, a change in the types of information requests received, adoption of language by senior management, success of stakeholders, and a decrease in concern over communicating science to target audiences.
5. Elements of KT-KB program design were considered. The importance of where such a program would be located organizationally, either as a new program or embedded in existing programs, was discussed with the need to create a space for a program seen as key. Other elements included building on existing initiatives, developing a set of core competencies or skill sets, developing training or mentoring opportunities, and promoting the program.
The concept of a larger KT-KB conference (beyond federal employees) was enthusiastically supported as a future initiative. The larger conference was viewed as a platform to build more awareness and support for KT-KB, move ahead on priority issues coming out of the Interdepartmental Dialogue, and learn from other organizations or fields that may be further developed in their KT-KB strategies or initiatives.
In the long term, success of the Interdepartmental Dialogue will be a function of how the ideas generated during the exchange effectively move forward and influence the cultures of science-policy interaction and departmental communication. Participants broadly affirmed their desire to champion the movement within their respective organizations. A series of action items were collectively identified to ensure momentum continues and the group and its evolving community stay connected over the long term. These included maintaining ownership of KT-KB; identifying a forum to share best practices and products; exposing senior management boards to the concept of KT-KB, and raising awareness and recognition of KT-KB.
The goal of the dialogue was to improve recognition, support and application of KT-KB within the federal government. There were a number of lessons learned in striving for that goal including the necessity of getting the right people together, creating commonalities amongst a disparate group by determining priorities in a concerted effort, providing a forum to network, share experiences and make connections, and using these events as a catalyst in developing momentum.
Environment Canada’s Science and Technology Liaison Division would like to acknowledge the contribution of representatives from the following federal departments and agencies to the Interdepartmental Dialogue on Knowledge Translation and Brokering:
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
- Canadian Food Inspection Agency
- Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
- Defence Research and Development Canada
- Environment Canada
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada
- Health Canada
- Indian and Northern Affairs Canada
- Industry Canada
- International Development Research Centre
- Natural Resources Canada
- Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada
- Public Health Agency of Canada
For further information please contact:
Science and Technology Liaison
Science and Technology Strategies Directorate
Science and Technology Branch
Science and Technology Liaison
Science and Technology Strategies Directorate
Science and Technology Branch
About this study series:
The need for robust scientific evidence in policy and decision making and for innovative mechanisms to sustain interaction between science producers and policy/decision makers is well recognized. Such interaction improves the uptake and use of research by science users, and also allows the user to inform the research agenda. Linking science with policy/program decisions is not straightforward and more effort is required to understand this relationship and maximize information flow between users and science producers.
Science and Technology Liaison has been involved in a number of initiatives aimed at strengthening links between science knowledge and policy/decision making. This series highlights these initiatives. This series and other Science and Technology Liaison products can be found at: www.ec.gc.ca/scitech/
Science and Technology Liaison is a knowledge translation and knowledge brokering unit. It focuses on customizing and targeting science knowledge to the user audience to improve uptake and utility, and on the development of mechanisms for sustained interaction between science and policy/program to not only “push” knowledge to the correct science user, but to allow the user to inform the research agenda (“policy pull”).
- Date Modified: