National Assessment of Pulp and Paper Environmental Effects Monitoring Data: Findings from Cycles 1 through 3
- Publishing Information
- Acknowledgement
- Abstract
- 1.0 Executive Summary
- 2.0 Introduction
- 3.0 Overview of Studies Conducted in Cycle 3
- 4.0 General Methods - Data Preparation and Analysis
- 4.1 General Methods - Procedure for Determining National Response
- 5.0 Fish Survey
- 5.1 Data Processing and Study Designs
- 5.2 Summary of Effect Sizes
- 5.3 Response Patterns and Meta-analyses
- 6.0 Fisheries Resources and Usability
- 7.0 Benthic Invertebrate Community Survey
- 7.1 Data Processing and Study Designs
- 7.2 Summary of Effect Sizes
- 7.3 Response Patterns and Meta-analyses
- 8.0 Sublethal Toxicity Testing - Introduction
- 8.1 Sublethal Toxicity Testing - Monitoring Changes in Effluent Quality Among Cycles
- 8.2 Sublethal Toxicity Testing - Summary and Future Considerations
- 9.0 Summary and Conclusions
- Glossary
- Acronyms / Abbreviations
- References
Acronyms / Abbreviations
| Acronyms/Abbreviations | Description |
|---|---|
| Adj. mean | adjusted mean |
| ANOVA | analysis of variance |
| ANCOVA | analysis of covariance |
| C2 | cycle 2 |
| C3 | cycle 3 |
| CES | critical effect size |
| EEM | Environmental Effects Monitoring |
| IC25 | inhibiting concentration for 25 % effect |
| LS | longnose sucker |
| MU | mummichog |
| NWRI | National Water Research Institute |
| PPER | Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations |
| RAPPER | Regulations Amending the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations |
| SAT | statistical assessment tool |
| SD | standard deviation |
| WS | white sucker |
| YP | yellow perch |
- Date Modified: