Final Screening Assessment
Candida utilis ATCC 9950
Environment and Climate Change Canada
(PDF Format - 468 KB)
Table of contents
- Decisions from Domestic and International Jurisdictions
- 1.Hazard Assessment
- 1.1 Characterization of Candida utilis
- 1.2 Biological and ecological properties
- 1.3 Effects
- 1.4 Hazard severity
- 2. Exposure Assessment
- 3.Risk Characterization
- 4. Conclusion
- 5. References
List of Tables
- Table 1-1: Morphological properties of C. utilis ATCC 9950
- Table 1-2: Biochemical properties of C. utilis ATCC 9950
- Table 1-3: Molecular properties of C. utilis ATCC 9950 predicted from shotgun sequences
- Table 1-4: Minimal inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for C. utilis ATCC 9950
- Table A-1: Growth of C. utilisATCC 9950 on various media and temperatures
List of Figures
- Figure 1-1: Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis of C. utilis ATCC 9950 using MIDI YST28 Yeast Database
- Figure 1-2: Phylogenetic analysis of select Candida species based on the alignment of the ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of the 18S and 28S rRNA genes
- Figure 1-3: Persistence of C. utilisATCC 9950, based on qPCR analyses of extractable soil DNA
- C. utilis ATCC 9950 and C. albicans SC5314
Pursuant to paragraph 74(b) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA), the Minister of Environment and Climate Change and the Minister of Health have conducted a screening assessment of Candida utilis ATCC 9950.
C. utilis ATCC 9950 is a yeast that has characteristics in common with other strains of the species C. utilis. C. utilis can adapt to varying conditions and thrives in soil and water. Multiple potential uses of C. utilis in consumer, industrial, commercial and agricultural sectors exist. These include production of food, natural health products, feeds, biochemicals used in cosmetics and therapeutic drugs, bioremediation and wastewater treatment.
C. utilis has an established history of use as a feed supplement in aquaculture, swine, poultry, and livestock diets, yet only two incidents of infection in vertebrates have been attributed to C. utilis. In both cases, the affected animals had pre-existing conditions and the infections were effectively treated with antifungals. No reports in the literature showed significant effects of C. utilis in terrestrial or aquatic plants or invertebrates. Certain strains of C. utilis have anti-algal, antibacterial and anti-fungal properties, which allow its use as a biocontrol agent against pest micro-organisms.
Although C. utilis has also been extensively used in the food industry, the incidence of human infection with C. utilis is exceedingly low. There have been no reported human infections attributed specifically to the Domestic Substances List (DSL) strain C. utilis ATCC 9950; however, some strains of C. utilis can act as opportunistic pathogens in susceptible individuals, particularly those who have a weakened immune system or underlying medical conditions.
This assessment considers the aforementioned characteristics of C. utilis ATCC 9950 with respect to environmental and human health effects associated with consumer and commercial product use and industrial processes subject to CEPA, including releases to the environment through waste streams and incidental human exposure through environmental media. A conclusion under CEPA on this living organism has no bearing on and does not preclude assessments, authorized under the Food and Drugs Act, of products produced by or containing C. utilis ATCC 9950. C. utilis ATCC 9950 was nominated to the DSL for use in the food industry. To update information on current uses, the Government launched a mandatory information-gathering survey under section 71 of CEPA (section 71 notice) as published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on October 3, 2009. Information submitted in response to the notice indicates that C. utilis ATCC 9950 was imported into Canada in 2008 for use in food production and processing. No uses related to consumer products were reported in Canada.
Considering all available lines of evidence presented in this screening assessment, there is low risk of harm to organisms and the broader integrity of the environment from C. utilis ATCC 9950. It is concluded that C. utilis ATCC 9950 does not meet the criteria under paragraph 64(a) or (b) of CEPA as it is not entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that have or may have an immediate or long-term harmful effect on the environment or its biological diversity or that constitute or may constitute a danger to the environment on which life depends.
Based on the information presented in this screening assessment, it is concluded that C. utilis ATCC 9950 does not meet the criteria under paragraph 64(c) of CEPA as it is not entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or health.
Pursuant to paragraph 74(b) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA), the Minister of Environment and the Minister of Health are required to conduct screening assessments of those living organisms added to the Domestic Substances List (DSL) by virtue of section 105 of the Act, to determine whether they present or may present a risk to the environment or human health (according to criteria as set out in section 64 of CEPA).Footnote 1 Candida utilisATCC 9950 was added to the DSLunder subsection 25(1) of CEPA 1988 and the DSL under subsection 105(1) of CEPA because it was manufactured in or imported into Canada between January 1, 1984 and December 31, 1986 and entered or was released into the environment without being subject to conditions under CEPA or any other Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province.
This screening assessment considers hazard information obtained from the public domain and from unpublished research data, as well as comments from scientific peer reviewers. Exposure information was also obtained from the public domain and from a mandatory CEPAsection 71 Notice published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on October 3, 2009. Further details on the risk assessment methodology used are available in the Risk Assessment Framework document entitled "Framework on the Science-Based Risk Assessment of Micro-organisms under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999" (Environment Canada and Health Canada 2011).
In this report, data that are specific to the DSL-listed strain, C. utilis ATCC 9950, are identified as such. Strain-specific data include information from the Nominator, the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and unpublished data generated by Health CanadaFootnote 2 and Environment CanadaFootnote 3 research scientists. Where strain-specific data were not available, surrogate information from literature searches was used. When applicable, literature searches conducted on the organism included its synonyms, and common and superseded names. Surrogate organisms are identified in each case to the taxonomic level provided by the source. Literature searches were conducted using scientific literature databases (SCOPUS, CAB Abstracts, and NCBI PubMed), web searches, and key search terms for the identification of human health and environmental hazards. Information identified up to June 2014 was considered for inclusion in this screening assessment report.
Decisions from Domestic and International Jurisdictions
The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) assigned C. utilis (as a species) to Risk Group 1 (low individual and community risk) for both humans and terrestrial animals (personal communication, PHAC 2014).
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) does not consider C. utilis as a regulated plant pest in Canada (personal communication, CFIA 2014). In addition, single ingredient feeds containing dehydrated Yeast Torula (common name for C. utilis), are exempt from the registration requirement under Part I, Schedule IV of the Feeds Regulations (CFIA 2014).
C. utilis, listed as dried Torula yeast, is an approved non-medicinal ingredient in the Natural Health Products Ingredients Database (NHPID). It can be safely used provided the total folic acid content of the yeast does not exceed 0.04 milligram per gram of yeast as permitted by the U.S. FDA and it must also comply with the monograph for Yeast, dried in the Food Chemicals Codex (Health Canada 2015).
In 2013, the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) under Section 172.896 of the Code of Federal Regulations permitted the use of dried C. utilis (also rferred as Torula yeast) as a food additive for human consumption provided that the total folic acid of the yeast does not exceed 0.04 mg/g of yeast (U.S. FDA 2013).
1. Hazard Assessment
1.1 Characterization of Candida utilis
1.1.1 Taxonomic identification and strain history
Binomial name Candida utilis(C. utilis)
Species utilis (Henneberg) Lodder et Kreger-van Rij(1952)
Strain ATCC 9950 (equivalent to NRRL Y-900, CBS 5609, DSM 2361, NBRC 0988)
Superseded names: Torula utilisHenneberg, Saccharomyces jadinii (Sartory, R. Sartory, Weill & J. Meyer), Torulopsis utilis (Henneberg) Lodder var. utilis
Anamorph of: Hansenula jadinii(Sartory, R. Sartory, Weill & J. Meyer), Pichia jadinii (Sartory et al.) Wickerham, Lindnera jadinii(A. & R. Satory, Weill & J. Meyer), Cyberlindnera jadinii (R. Sartory, R. Sartory, Weill & J. Meyer).
C. utilis is an asexual non-filamentous ascomycete. It is the asexual (anamorph) state of Pichia (Hanensula, Cyberlindnera) jadinii (Kurtzman et al. 1979; Yamada et al. 1995). Regardless of the reproductive state, the names P. jadinii and C. utilis have been used synonymously in numerous publications (Kurtzman 1988, Barnett 2004).
Common names: Torula Yeast, Fodder Yeast
According to the United States Department of Agriculture's ARS Culture Collection, the organism was originally isolated from animal fodder (USDA ARS 2014). It was deposited at the USDA ARS Culture Collection (NRRL) as NRRL Y-900 and to the American Type Culture Collection as ATCC accession number 9950. The strain was also deposited in various culture collections with the following designations: CCRC 20325, IFO 0988, NCYC 707, NRCC 2721, VTT C-78085.
126.96.36.199 Phenotypic and molecular characteristics
The genus Candida contains over 150 species (Barnett et al. 2000; Dorko et al. 2000). With the exceptions of C. glabrata and C. krusei, almost all of the pathogenic Candida species, including C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. dubliniensis, and C. parapsilosis, belong in a single Candida clade characterized by the unique translation of CUG codons as serine rather than leucine (Butler et al. 2009). C. utilis, on the other hand, is a member of a distinct clade separate from other Candidayeasts including those commonly associated with human disease (Buerth et al. 2011; Tomita et al. 2012).
The purpose of this section is to describe methodologies that can be used to distinguish between C. utilis and other Candida species, particularly C. albicans which isacommensal gut yeast in humans but is also the most common cause of opportunistic fungal infection. A polyphasic approach is important in generating a robust taxonomic identification that allows for clear differentiation of C. utilis from closely-related pathogenic Candida species.
In clinical settings, culture-based rapid identification methods based on biochemical and metabolic endpoints, such as the Candida ID, API Candida, API 20C, API ID 32C, VITEK System, and RapID Yeast Plus (Barnett et al. 2000; Fricker-Hidalgo et al. 2001; Hata et al. 2007; Verweij et al. 1999) are often used for the diagnostic identification of Candida and other clinically relevant yeasts.
Phenotypic properties comparing C. utilis ATCC 9950 with C. albicans are summarized in Tables 1-1 and 1-2. Morphology of C. utilis on chromogenic agar, corn meal-Tween 80 agar and in a germ tube test is distinctly different (Table 1-1).
|Characteristic||C. utilis ATCC 9950|
(DSL strain)Footnote Table 1-1a
|C. albicans ATCC MYA-2786|
(equivalent to SC5314)a
|Chromogenic agar||Circular, pink, glossy||Circular, green smooth|
|Corn meal-Tween 80 agar||Pseudohyphae|
|Germ tube test||Negative||Positive|
|Czapek agar||3 mm diameter, circular, entire, flat-convex, white/off-white, moist, opaque||1 mm diameter, circular, entire, flat-convex, white/off-white, opaque|
In contrast to C. albicans, C. utilis does not form chlamydospores (Kondo et al. 1995; NCYC 2014) (shown in Figure A-1), which when present in C. albicans are developed at true hyphal extremities. The presence of chlamydospores is the basis of a method for rapid presumptive identification of Candida species infection: the germ tube test (Sheppard et al. 2008).
In contrast to the true hyphae seen in C. albicans, C. utilis (including ATCC 9950) produces only simple pseudohyphae (Kurtzman et al. 1979) (rfer to Figure A-1). Structurally, hyphae are narrower and more uniform than pseudohyphal buds, which have a constriction between the mother and daughter cells (reviewed in Sudbery et al. 2004).
|Characteristic||C. utilis ATCC 9950|
|C. albicans ATCC MYA-2786|
(equivalent to SC5314)
|Growth at 37°C on YPD||Yes (CBS-KNAW, 2014)||Yes (Thewes et al. 2008)|
|Growth at 42°C on YPD||No (CBS-KNAW, 2014)||Yes (Lorenz and Fink, 2001)|
|Crabtree effect (production of ethanol in aerobic condition)||Negative (Tomita et al. 2012)||Negative (Helmerhorst et al. 2006)|
|Trehalose assimilation||NegativeFootnote Table 1-2a||Positivea|
|L-rhamnose assimilation||Negative (Kurtzman et al. 1979)||Negative (CBS-KNAW, 2014)|
Fatty acid compositional analysis, shown in Figure 1-1, was conducted by Health Canada scientists on C. utilisATCC 9950 using GC-FAME and the Sherlock® MIDI Microbial Identification System.
Figure 1-1: Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis of C. utilis ATCC 9950 using MIDI YST28 Yeast Database
Long description for figure 1-1
Figure 1-1: Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis of C. utilis ATCC 9950 using MIDI YST28 Yeast Database. Figure 1-1 shows the relatedness of DSL strain C. utilis ATCC 9950 to other yeasts according to their cellular fatty acid compositional similarity using GC-FAME and the Sherlock® MIDI Microbial Identification System. Based on the dendrogram, the DSL C. utilis strain is distantly related to C. albicans.
Based on cellular fatty acid composition, the DSL C. utilis strain, ATCC 9950, is not closely related to C. albicans. Similarly, Singh et al. (2010) demonstrated that C. utilis has a very distinctive phospholipid profile compared to C. albicans using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.
The secreted proteome of C. utilis ATCC 9950, grown on SD medium, was analyzed by Buerth et al. (2011) using mass spectroscopy. A total of 37 proteins were identified and compared with the secreted proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, C. albicans and C. glabrata. Most of the C. utilis ATCC 9950 secreted proteins, such as glucanases, glucanosyltransferase, chitin transglycosylase, and thioredoxin, are homologous and function similarly to those secreted by C. albicans and C. glabrata. These proteins are used for cell wall assembly and maintenance, and stress response. Others are unique to C. utilis ATCC 9950, and their presence could be helpful in its identification. They include proteins associated with carbon metabolism and nitrate assimilation, such as invertase and asparaginase, respectively (Buerth et al. 2011). Proteins related to pathogenicity in C. albicans, such as aspartyl proteases and the Op4 protein, were not detected in C. utilis ATCC9950 (Buerth et al. 2011). For more details about the role of these proteins in pathogenicity, rfer to section 1.2.9.
Phylogenetic analysis was conducted by Health Canada scientists in 2013 on C. utilis ATCC 9950 and clinically significant Candida species using publicly available Candida 18S and 28S rRNA gene sequences and on C. utilis ATCC 9950 sequences generated in-house. The resulting dendrogram (Figure 1-2) demonstrates the divergence between C. utilis ATCC 9950 and pathogenic Candida species, such as C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis, and to a lesser extent C. glabrata. This finding is consistent with others reported in the scientific literature (Buerth et al. 2011; Tomita et al. 2012).
Figure 1-2: Phylogenetic analysis of select Candida species based on the alignment of the ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of the 18S and 28S rRNA genes
Long description for figure 1-2
Figure 1-2: Phylogenetic tree (shown in Figure 1-2) was generated using publicly available nucleotide sequences containing internal transcribed spacer region of varying length from clinically significant Candida species. The phylogenetic tree shows that C. utilis ATCC 9950 is closely related to C. utilis type strain and Pichia jadinii and that they are not part of a cluster that includes clinical Candida species such as C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. dubliniensis.
The genome of C. utilis ATCC 9950 was sequenced by Buerth et al. (2011) and Tomita et al. (2012). The genomic composition determined from the shotgun sequence determined by Tomita et al.(2012) is summarized in Table 1-3.
|Characteristic||C. utilis ATCC 9950Footnote Table 1-3a|
|Genome size||14.6 Mb|
|Predicted number of genes||8864|
|G+C content (%)||45.36|
|Genomic Sequence Accession Numbers||BAEL01000001 – BAEL01001163|
The large subunit (LSU) D2 rDNA and ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 regions from C. utilis ATCC 9950 were sequenced by Health Canada researchers based on methods by Chen et al. (2000) and Ciardo et al. (2006) and were used as query sequences against the fungal database of the Applied BioSystems Microseq and the DNA databases of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). Using the LSU D2 region sequence for comparison in the Microseq database, C. utilis ATCC 9950 is 99.8% homologous to its teleomorph Pichia jadinii (type strain ATCC 18201). NCBI BLAST sequence alignments of the ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 region show 95% and 100% rDNA homology to P. jadinii type strain.
Other molecular techniques that can be used to complement phenotypic methods and to reliably distinguish closely-related Candida species include:
- PCR assay using universal fungal primers and species-specific probes targeting the ITS2 region (Elie et al. 1998)
- 18S rRNA sequencing from species with characteristic phenotypes, such as the production of ubiquinone (Suzuki and Nakase 2002)
- multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of housekeeping genes (reviewed in Spampinato and Leonardi 2013; Bougnoux et al. 2004; Odds and Jacobsen 2008; Tavanti et al. 2005)
- microsatellite length polymorphism of short tandem repeats (Botterel et al. 2001; Enache-Angoulvant et al. 2010; Garcia-Hermoso et al. 2010; L'Ollivier et al. 2012; Tavanti et al. 2003)
Currently published methods do not permit distinction between different C. utilis strains.
1.2 Biological and ecological properties
1.2.1 Natural occurrence
Environmental strains of C. utilis have been isolated from various geographic locations and habitats including:
- phyllosphere of the halophyte Halocnemum strobilaceum(type of shrub) in the southern coast of Kuwait (Al-Mailem et al. 2010),
- soil (Atuanya and Oseghe 2006; Pan et al. 2009; Zheng et al. 2001),
- eutrophic lakes in Olsztyn, Poland from a depth of up to 30 cm and 4.5 m away from the shore (Biedunkiewicz et al. 2013),
- air (Pisman and Somova 2003)
- water from melted icicles in north-eastern Poland (Biedunkiewicz and Ejdys 2011),
- deep well in Qena, Egypt (Mohawed 1994),
- hydrophyte wastewater treatment plant in Nowa Słupia, Poland (Biedunkiewicz and Ozimek 2009),
- landfill leachate, activated sludge flocs and in sewage treatment batch reactor outflow in Poland (Szyłak-Szydłowski and Korniłłowicz-Kowalska 2012), and
- wastewater from cassava processing plants in Nigeria (Arotupin 2007).
Occurrence of other Candida species, such as C. albicans, C. glabarata, C. guillermondii, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. solani and C. zeylanoides in aquatic habitats (i.e. fresh water, estuaries, marine water, sewage, and polluted water) was reported in the literature (Ahearn et al. 1968; Buck 1977; Buck and Bubucis 1978; Cook and Schlitzer 1981; reviewed in Jones and Schmitt 1978). Given that most Candida species are considered commensal gut yeasts in humans, it has been speculated that their isolation from aquatic environments likely results from contamination with human or animal excrement (Ahearn et al. 1968).
A soil persistence study on C. utilis ATCC 9950 undertaken by Environment Canada in 2005 used strain specific non-coding amplified fragment length polymorphism to estimate changes in concentration of the micro-organism. The study showed that if released into soil at an initial density of 104 CFU/g soil, the C. utilis ATCC 9950 population increases within 15 days to a density of 106 CFU/g soil. The population persists for up to 42 days, then declines to concentrations below the detection limit of 103 CFU/g soil (Figure 1-3) (personal communication, Beaudette 2014).
Figure 1-3: Persistence of C. utilisATCC 9950, based on qPCR analyses of extractable soil DNA
Long description for figure 1-3
Figure 1-3: Figure 1-3 is a line chart with concentration (log CFU/g soil) on the X axis and sampling day on the Y axis. The line shows an initial concentration of 10e4 CFU/g soil, an increase in concentration at 15 days to a density of 10e6 CFU/g soil. At sampling days 24 and 42, the cell concentration has declined to 10e5 CFU/g soil, after which, it declines to a concentration below the detection limit of 103 CFU/g soil at the 76-day sampling day.
1.2.2 Growth conditions
C. utilis is a facultative anaerobe. On sugars, fermentation occurs only under anaerobic conditions and growth is slow (Kurtzman et al. 1979; Visser et al. 1990; Franzblau and Sinclair 1983; Ordaz et al. 2001; Weusthuis et al. 1994). Under aerobic conditions, no accumulation of ethanol is observed (rferred to as the Crabtree-effect) (Kaliterna et al. 1995; Tomita et al. 2012).
C. utilis ATCC 9950 has a growth temperature range of 10°C to 39°C with optimal growth observed at 35°C (NCYC 2014). Growth kinetics of C. utilisATCC 9950 on various growth media at different temperatures was conducted at Health Canada and is shown in Appendix A Table A-1.
C. utilis is adaptable to a wide range of substrates and conditions. Itthrives in environments that are rich in sugars such as xylose, hexose and pentose (Buerth et al. 2011; Chakravorty et al. 1962; Chang 1985; Kurtzman et al. 1979; Lee and Kyun Kim 2001). C. utilis, including ATCC 9950, is generally cultivated on by-products containing free sugars, such as wastes from food and beverage manufacturing (Gold et al. 1981).
C. utilis also grows on organic acids and alcohols. Diauxic growth pattern was observed on C. utilis strain CBS621 on mixtures of sugars and ethanol (Weusthuis et al. 1994). During growth on glucose and ethanol, both substrates are utilized simultaneously, but when the yeast is provided with mixtures of maltose and ethanol, the latter substrate is prferentially utilized.
The organism thrives on media supplemented with nitrogen compounds, such as urea, ammonium salts, pyrimidine, and various amino acids (Buerth et al. 2011). C. utilis also grows well in sulfur-rich environments. When cultivated for single-cell protein biomass, C. utilis is often grown in sulfite liquor generated from pulp and paper processing (Gold et al. 1981; Streit et al. 1987).
Certain strains of C. utilis can grow on a wide range of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons as sole sources of carbon and energy (Al-Mailem et al. 2010).
C. utilis strains that have been used in industrial fermentation processes have been exposed to fluctuations in temperature, oxygen concentration, osmotic pressure, pH, nutrient availability and salts. The following examples illustrate the extent to which C. utilis strains tolerate fluctuations in different parameters:
- Viability of C. utilis strain RD898 decreased with increasing osmotic pressure, where 15-26 MPa osmotic pressure caused a loss of 40% of the population at 22°C (Mille et al. 2005);
- C. utilis strain HP-P1 grew well in salinities between 1 to 2M NaCl, but did not tolerate salinities greater than 2M NaCl (Al-Mailem et al. 2010);
- C. utilis strain WSH 02–08 was not affected by extremes in pH from 5.5 to 10.5 (Nie et al. 2005). C. utilis ATCC 60459 tolerated temperatures up to 50°C when a circadian-like rhythm of the light-dark cycle is in place; survival was markedly decreased in constant darkness (Lapena et al. 2006). The authors speculated that the transient development of resistance to various stresses for this strain under the stationary growth phase was in response to light-induced generation of reactive oxygen species; and
- Metabolism of C. utilis ATCC 60560 was affected relatively quickly following a 15 minute interruption of air supply (Vraná and Sobotka 1989).
1.2.3 Nutrient cycling
Nitrate assimilation is a unique characteristic of C. utilis (Tomita et al. 2012). The C. utilisATCC 9950 genome sequence revealed the existence of a contiguous nitrate/nitrite assimilation gene cluster which is considered to be responsible for the nitrate assimilation phenotype in C. utilis (Tomita et al. 2012).
C. utilis strain F87 can control eutrophication by converting nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus into microbial protein, simultaneously inhibiting the growth of the algae Microcystis aeruginosa (Kong et al. 2013). The authors showed that C. utilis strain F87 was better able to absorb ammonia nitrogen and phosphorus than M. aeruginosa in water, and the growth of M. aeruginosa was inhibited due to the lack of nutrients.
Various C. utilis strains have antibacterial and antifungal properties that are expressed either through the secretion of enzymes or interaction with other micro-organisms:
- C. utilisstrain PYCC 3671 showed potential "killer phenotype" against a variety of Candida and non-Candida species (Antunes and Aguiar 2012);
- When used to ferment the biomass of Ecklonia cava(brown algae),
- C. utilis strain KCTC 11355 exhibited an antibiotic property against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (Eom et al. 2013);
- C. utilis strain TISTR 5001, in combination with plant extracts, was used as a fungicide against post-harvest green mold rot on tangerines caused by Penicillium digitatum(Sukorinia et al. 2013);
- At a concentration of 108 CFU/mL, C. utilisstrain MPPLY-001 alone or in combination with chitosan effectively controlled tomato fruit rot caused by Alternaria alternataand Geotrichum candidum (Sharma et al. 2006);
- A consortium containing C. utilis was found to inhibit fire blight disease caused by Erwinia amylovora in apples (Martinez et al. 2008);
- Certain strains of C. utilis have been utilized as biocontrol agents against post-harvest bacterial and fungal pathogens in citrus fruits (Sukorinia et al. 2013), tomatoes (Sharma et al. 2006), and apples (Martinez et al. 2008).
- C. utilis acted as a probiotic, enhancing protection against pathogenic bacteria Pasteurella haemolityca and Vibrio alginolyticus for Artemia nauplii (brine shrimp) larvae (Abdelkarim et al. 2010); and
- C. utilis provided moderate protection to rainbow trout against the fish pathogen Aeromonas salmonicida(Siwicki et al. 1994).
A consortium containing bacteria and fungi, including C. utilis, has been shown to promote growth on hydroponic Lolium perenne L. (turf grass), as well as to reduce tearing out of the grass (Gaggìa et al. 2013).
1.2.5 Biosorption of metals
The capacity of naturally-occurring strains of C. utilis to adsorb certain metals has been investigated. A few examples are listed below:
- C. utilis ATCC 9950 adsorbed 5.42 mg magnesium/g dry cell mass (Blazejak et al. 2008) and 181.7 mg of zinc/g dry cell mass (Ahmad et al. 2013);
- C. utilis strain RIBM C8 adsorbed cadmium 8.7 mg/g dry cell mass at pH 5.4 and 28 mg/g dry cell mass at pH 5.5 (Kujan et al. 2006);
- Intact and dehydrated C. utilis cells were utilized to uptake hexavalent chromium from an aqueous solution in the presence of other metals (Muter et al. 2002); and
- Failla et al. (1976) demonstrated the presence of a highly specific zinc ion transporter in C. utilis strain NRRL-Y-7634, which allows for the uptake, solubilization, transport and storage of zinc ions from the environment.
1.2.6 Susceptibility to chemical agents and antifungals
Certain strains of C. utilis are susceptible to acriflavine (Keyhani et al. 2009), and agricultural fungicides such as cymoxanil, penconazol, and dichlofluanid (Ribeiro et al. 2000).
Susceptibility of other Candida species to chemical disinfectants has been reported in the literature. Jones and Schmitt (1978) investigated the effect of chlorination on the survival of C. albicans. A cell concentration of 105 CFU/mL exposed to 2 ppm chlorine with a 30 minute contact period was reduced 101 CFU/mL, and 4, 8, 16, and 25-ppm treatments were lethal. C. albicans is also susceptible to quaternary ammonium compounds, such as benzalkomium chloride and cetrimide (Gupta et al. 2002; reviewed in McDonnell and Russell 1999). Moreover, C. albicans is susceptible to ozone, a gas commonly used in purification of drinking water, at an average concentration of 0.064 mg O3/L (Restaino et al. 1995).
Antifungal susceptibility patterns of C. utilisisolated from clinical specimens indicate that C. utilisis susceptible to echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin), triazoles (itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, posaconazole), and amphotericin B (Fleck et al. 2007; Pfaller et al. 2011; Tortorano et al. 2004). As shown in Table 1-4, antibiotic susceptibility testing conducted by Health Canada in 2013 indicates that C. utilis ATCC 9950 is susceptible to amphotericin B, nystatin, clotrimazole, isoconazole, micafungin, terbinafine, and 5-fluorocystosine + amphotericin B, which is consistent with the findings in the literature for the treatment of Candida infections.
|Antifungal||MIC (μg/mL)Footnote Table 1-4a|
|Amphotericin B||4.5 ± 1.7|
|Nystatin||3.8 ± 1.5|
|5-Fluorocytosine||greater than 24|
|5-Fluorocytosine + Amphotericin B||1.1 ± 0.4|
|Clotrimazole||1.1 ± 0.4|
|Intraconazole||15 ± 6|
|Terbinafine||1.3 ± 0.4|
|Griseofulvin||greater than 24|
1.2.7 Pathogenic and toxigenic properties
C. utilis has relatively low virulence compared to pathogenic species of Candida, presumably because it lacks one or more of the virulence factors described below that contribute to the pathogenicity of C. albicans.
Morphogenesis (switching from cellular to hyphal to filamentous growth forms, and switching between opaque and white cell and colony phenotypes) is an important part of the pathogenic life cycle of C. albicans (Nadeem et al. 2013; Nie et al. 2010; Ramírez-Zavala et al. 2008; Vylkova et al. 2011; Whiteway and Bachewich 2007). An extensive search of the scientific literature provided no evidence to suggest that C. utilis can undergo morphogenesis, either from white to opaque phenotype or from cellular to hyphal growth.
In C. albicans, adherence to host endothelial and epithelial cells is mediated by a range of cell wall glycoproteins (Hoyer 2001; Kinneberg et al. 1999; Staab et al. 1996). These surface adhesins also contribute to fungal antigenic variation (Liu and Filler 2011) and formation of biofilms (Nobile et al. 2008).C. utilis may share some glycoproteins with C. albicans, as there is antigenic cross-reactivity between the hyphal wall protein of C. albicans and C. utilis(Laín et al. 2007); however, in general these glycoproteins are specific to C. albicans based on antigenic specificity.
Quorum sensing molecules, such as farnesol and tyrosol, are involved in regulating virulence in C. albicans (Cremer et al. 1999; Westwater et al. 2005). An extensive search of the scientific literature provided no evidence to suggest that C. utilis ATCC 9950 produces these quorum sensing molecules.
C. utilis forms biofilmsin clinical settings. Paulitsch et al. (2009) reported that C. utilis was recovered from 1% of indwelling devices collected from intensive care units in Austria. Using scanning electron microscopy, the isolated C. utilis cells were described to be in an early stage of biofilm formation (i.e. mainly yeast cells in a basal layer). In vitro biofilm formation by a clinical isolate of C. utilis was enhanced in the presence of heparin preservative in the culture medium (Sabouraud Dextrose Broth at 37ºC for 6 h; while EDTA was shown to reduce C. utilis biofilm formation (Al Akeel et al. 2013). Biofilms are relevant to pathogenicity because they exhibit increased drug resistance relative to planktonic cells and can seed bloodstream infections that result in life-threatening systemic disease (reviewed in Finkel and Mitchell 2010).
Proteolytic enzymes and phospholipases
Production of proteolytic enzymes, such as aspartic protease (Sap), is considered crucial for C. albicans to cause epithelial tissue damage, tissue penetration during disseminated infection, and evasion and destruction of macrophages (Albrecht et al. 2006; reviewed in Gropp et al. 2009; Hube and Naglik, 2001; Naglik et al. 2004; Schaller et al. 1999). These enzymes are also associated with hyphal formation and phenotypic switching (Naglik et al. 2003). Aspartic proteases were not detected in C. utilis ATCC 9950 (Buerth et al. 2011). In C. albicans, extracellular phospholipases have been linked to adherence and membrane disruption during host cell invasion (Barrett-Bee et al. 1985; Ibrahim et al. 1995; Leidich et al. 1998). An extracellular phospholipase B has been identified in C. utilis (Fujino et al. 2006; Buerth et al. 2011).
Induction of efflux pumps, encoded by the transporter genes cdr1, cdr2, and mdr1, has have been implicated in azole resistance in Candida albicans (Franz et al. 1998; Prasad et al. 1995; Riggle and Kumamoto 2006; Sanglard et al. 1997; Wirsching et al. 2000). Up-regulation of these genes in C. albicans biofilms has been related to intrinsic resistance of sessile cells to fluconazole compared with planktonic cells (Ramage et al. 2002). An extensive search of the scientific literature provided no evidence to suggest that the genome of C. utilis ATCC 9950 contains genes that have been associated with antimicrobial resistance.
C. utilis ATCC 9950 is a tetraploid yeast (Ikushima et al. 2009; Tomita et al. 2012). In the mouse model of infection, C. albicans tetraploids were reported to be less virulent than diploids, either because they are inherently less able to survive host defenses, or may be outcompeted by the parental diploids, or they rapidly return to the diploid state via random chromosome loss (Ibrahim et al. 2005; Bennett and Johnson 2003).
The ability to grow optimally at normal human body temperature (37°C) and pH and to thrive at febrile temperatures also contributes to the incidence of C. albicans infections in humans. Generally, prolific hyphal growth requires a temperature of 37°C (reviewed in Sudbery 2011; Heilmann et al. 2011). Although C. utilis ATCC 9950 can grow at temperatures up to 39°C, its optimal growth is reported to be at 35°C.
A pH of 7.4 was found to be best suited for hyphal induction in vitro (Nadeem et al. 2013). Nonetheless, C. albicans is known to colonize and infect anatomical sites of diverse pH, including the mildly acidic mouth, skin and vagina, neutral intestine and blood, and highly acidic stomach (reviewed in Davis 2003; Vylkova et al. 2011).
In vitro and in vivo tests conducted on C. utilis ATCC 9950 at Health Canada found:
- minimal cytotoxic effects on HT29 human colonic epithelial cells and J774A.1 macrophages after 2, 4 and 6 h of exposure to C. utilis ATCC 9950 with decreased cytotoxicity after 24 h;
- no hemolytic activity on sheep blood agar after 48 h at 28°C and 37°C;
- in four BALB/c mice per treatment, 1.0 x 106 CFU/25 μL exposed by endotracheal instillation showed, no changes in behaviour or physical appearance over a one week monitoring period, no significant increase in lung granulocytes and pro-inflammatory cytokines, or blood cytokine marker levels one week after exposure; and rapid clearance of C. utilis ATCC 9950 from the lungs, with dramatically reduced fungal cell numbers after 2 h and no yeast cells detected one week post exposure.
No reports have been specifically attributed to the DSL strain C. utilis ATCC 9950 in the scientific literature. Nonetheless, there have been rare reports of naturally-occurring infection in terrestrial mammals with other strains of C. utilis.
No reports in the literature implicate C. utilis in adverse effects in terrestrial or aquatic plants.
Certain strains of C. utilis have been used as biocontrol agents against disease-causing agents in plants (Section 1.2.4) without adverse effect in treated plants, which further supports its non-pathogenic nature in plants.
No reports in the literature implicate C. utilis in adverse effects in terrestrial or aquatic invertebrates. Instead,
- Lehner (1983) found that C. utilis is a suitable pollen substitute in the diets of Apis melllifera(honeybees). In a similar study, an increase in bee population was observed in colonies fed with the yeast (Peng et al. 1984);
- C. utilis has been used successfully either as a feed supplement or as algae substitutes in the diets of Sydney rock oysters (Brown et al. 1996; Nell 1985; Nell et al. 1996) and American oysters (Epifanio 1979; Urban and Langdon 1984) with no adverse effects reported; and
- live and freeze-dried C. utilis was successfully used as alternative food source for Penaeus japonicas (penaeid shrimp) with no adverse effect on growth or survival (Rahman 1996).
No adverse effects on fish were attributed to C. utilisin the following feeding studies. Instead,
- substitution of animal protein with 30% inactive C. utilis in the diet of Oreochromis mossambicusPeters(tilapia) and Salmo salar (Atlantic salmon) pre-smolts (Olvera-Novoa et al. 2002; Øverland et al. 2013) enhanced growth;
- likewise, C. utilis protein supplement in the diet of Atlantic salmon counteracted intestinal inflammation arising from the conventional diet containing extracted soybean meal (Grammes et al. 2013);
- Al-Hafedh and Alam (2013) reported that crude protein from C. utilis could also be used to replace fishmeal in Nile tilapia fingerlings without adverse effect on fish growth performance or feed utilization;
- C. utilis (viability unknown) was found to be a suitable feed for Cyprius carpio (carp) larvae, either alone or in combination with fish meal (Hecht and Viljoen 1982);
- in Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout), diet supplemented with dried C. utilis stimulated growth and improved feed conversion rate (Stevens and Truog 1957);
- similarly, Martin et al. (1993) deemed dried C. utilisa good substitute for traditional sources of protein in rainbow trout; and
- diet containing dried C. utilis resulted in immunostimulation in rainbow trout and protection against Aeromonas salmonicida (Siwicki et al. 1994).
In the following feeding studies on poultry, swine and cattle no adverse effects were observed due to the presence of dried C. utilis in the diet. Instead,
- chickens exposed to diet supplemented with probiotics containing C. utilis, Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus in drinking water at 4.0 x 109 CFU/chicken/day for three days showed enhanced intestinal mucosal immune response up to 10 days post-exposure (Yurong et al. 2005);
- Rodríguez et al. (2013) reported that C. utilis was effectively used to replace 20% of the soybean meal protein in broiler chicken diet;
- C. utilis was used as protein substitute for up to 66% of total protein in pig feed for 8 days with no effect on weight or feed conversion (Mora et al. 2012);
- bulls exposed to an herb diet supplemented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 15 x 1011 CFU C. utilis/g feed showed an increase in body weight (Mahyuddin and Winugroho 2010); and
- one study reported that as a feed additive, the purified C. utilis cell wall elicited an immune response in germ-free piglets following a 54-day feeding experiment (Fencl et al. 1982). Histological analyses indicate an increase in immunoglobulin levels resulting from the stimulation of intestinal lymphatic apparatus of the jejunum and colon. Nevertheless, the animals were in good clinical condition throughout the study.
In a 4-week mouse study, Uetsuka et al. (1976) reported no mortalities in 80 mice dosed intravenously with 2.0 x 108 CFU/mL C. utilis strain FO-0639. Eight of the 40 mice had mild pyelitis, while three developed encephalitis.
In fifteen cortisone-treated (immunosuppressed) and untreated female Swiss Webster mice exposed intravenously to 1.0 x 107 CFU C. utilis strain ATCC 20248, no evidence of hyphae formation, inflammatory response, or tissue invasion, and no deaths were observed during the 30-day study (Holzschu et al. 1979). C utilis at concentrations of 104 - 106 CFU/g tissue was recovered from the brain of mice sacrificed at day 6. Histopathological examination at day 30 showed persistence of the fungus in the kidney of the cortisone-treated mice (density of 1.70 x 103 CFU/g), but no signs of renal infection were observed. The authors considered that the recovery of residual fungus from the brains of mice sacrificed at day 6 was a function of the inoculation route rather than a neurotropic effect. The large volume of blood directed anteriorly from the heart could have carried the yeast to the brain where they may have been mechanically trapped in small vessels.
Two cases of arthritic joint infection caused by C. utilis in horses have been reported. C. utilis was isolated from synovial fluid samples of a three-year-old Standard bred filly with a history of bacterial infectious arthritis (Cohen et al. 2008).
C. utilis infection was effectively treated with the combination of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and arthroscopic debridement. Hepworth (2012) reported a case of equine septic arthritis due to C. utilis. As with the previous case, the horse had a history of joint problems and had received corticosteroid treatments. C. utilis was also cultured from synovial fluid samples. The fungal infection was effectively treated with fluconazole. Cohen et al. (2008) attributed the ability of C. utilis to thrive in the joint, an area generally considered inhospitable for fungal growth, to the combination of antibiotics and local immune suppression with corticosteroid from previous treatments.
C. utilis has been sporadically isolated from cows with mastitis. A strain of C. utilis was isolated among other bacteria and yeasts (2.4% of total microbial load) from infected cows in Turkey (Turkylmaz and Kaynarca 2010). Similarly, Wawron et al. (2010) reported that C. utilis was the least common yeast isolated from infected udder secretions of cows in Poland, comprising of only 0.67% (1of 150 isolated species). However, unlike other Candida species, such as C. krusei, C. albicans, C. guilliermundi, C. kefyrand C. rugosa, C. utilis has not been implicated as an etiological agent of bovine mastitis (Costa et al. 1993; dos Santos and Marin 2005; Farnsworth and Sorensen 1972; Şeker 2010; Watts 1988; Zhou et al. 2013). Infections are often attributed to poor animal hygiene, the excessive and erratic use of antimicrobials and immunosuppressive drugs, and presence of other chronic diseases (reviewed in Watts 1988).
Among all the Candida species, C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosistogether account for approximately 95% identifiable Candida infections (reviewed in Butler et al. 2009). Other species, including C. krusei, C. lusitaniae, and C. guilliermondii, account for less than 5% of invasive candidiasis (reviewed in Butler et al. 2009).
C. utilis is generally not considered as an etiological agent of infection in humans, but it has occasionally been isolated from clinical samples. Based on epidemiological surveys conducted worldwide and on reported cases, the clinical isolation of C. utilis is rare (Lyon et al. 2010; Montagna et al. 2014; Oberoi et al. 2012; Odds et al. 2007; Paulitsch et al. 2006; Pfaller et al. 2011; Presterl et al. 2007; Tortorano et al. 2004). C. utilis has been recovered from patients' blood, alimentary tract, urine, mouth, feces and cervix (Alsina et al. 1988; Dorko et al. 2000; Hazen et al. 1999; Lyon et al. 2010; Song et al. 2009).
The incidence of C. utilis infection is low. It has been linked to a few cases of candidemia in neonates, and individuals who have undergone invasive medical procedures or with existing health conditions (González et al. 2008; Lukic-Grlić et al. 2011; Luzzati et al. 2013; Montagna et al. 2014; Pfaller et al. 2012; Pfaller et al. 2011; Presterl et al. 2007; Tortorano et al. 2004),including keratitis (Alkatan et al. 2012; Shih et al. 1999), urinary tract infection (Dorko and Pilipcinec, 2002; Hazen et al. 1999), vaginitis (Al Akeel et al. 2013), dental thrush (Song et al. 2009), and fungaemia (Dekeyser et al. 2003). Hospital-acquired C. utilis fungemia, attributed to contamination of indwelling medical devices, has also been reported (Alsina et al. 1988), while a rare case of fungemia in an immunocompetent (otherwise healthy) individual was also documented (Bougnoux et al. 1993).
No outbreaks related to C. utilis have been reported. C. utilis infections have rarely resulted in mortality. Deaths are often directly attributed to significant co-morbidities, rather than to the presence of C. utilis in the clinical material.
No cases of allergic reaction have been reported specifically for C. utilis ATCC 9950; however other strains of C. utilis have been linked to sensitization amongst atopic individuals (up to 35% of this sub-population) (Koivikko et al. 1988).
- C. utilis sharescommon antigens with C. albicans and multiple concurrent sensitization to extracts of several Candida sp. including C. utilis, has been reported in atopic patients, suggesting the possible presence of one or more common skin reactive allergens (Koivikko et al. 1988). The theoretical implication is that persons previously sensitized to C. albicans are likely to experience elicitation reactions when exposed to C. utilis antigens; and
- Sensitization to feed dusts containing C. utilisantigens was reported among swine workers with five to ten years' experience in swine production in Finland (Katila et al. 1981). Respiratory symptoms include coughing and dyspnoea.
1.4 Hazard severity
A combination of morphological, biochemical, and molecular traits allows C. utilis to be reliably discriminated from other Candida species, especially closely-related pathogens such as C. albicans.
Information from the scientific literature suggests that neither C. utilis,nor its teleomorph Pichia jadinii, is a frank pathogen towards environmental species. There is no evidence to suggest that C. utilis has adversely affected terrestrial or aquatic invertebrates, plants or vertebrates. C. utilis has an established history of safe use as a feed supplement, either in live or inactive form, in aquaculture, swine, poultry, and livestock diets. Results from pathogenicity testing on mice also indicate that C. utilis does not cause adverse effects. Only two incidents of secondary infections (not experimentally-induced) were attributed to C. utilis and, in both cases, the animals had pre-existing conditions and the infections were effectively treated with antifungals. Thus, the environmental hazard severity for C. utilis ATCC 9950 is estimated to be low.
No human infections have been specifically attributed to the DSL strain C. utilis ATCC 9950 in the scientific literature. Despite its long history of use in food production worldwide, there have only been a few cases of infection associated with exposure to C. utilis. These include reports of secondary infection in individuals with predisposing factors such as compromised immunity. In most cases, the infections were effectively treated with antifungals. The human hazard severity for C. utilis ATCC 9950 is therfore estimated to be low.
Hazards related to micro-organisms used in the workplace should be classified accordingly under the Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHMIS)Footnote 4.
2. Exposure Assessment
2.1 Sources of exposure
The focus of this assessment is to characterize the exposure to C. utilis ATCC 9950 from its deliberate addition to consumer or commercial products or its use in industrial processes in Canada.
C. utilis ATCC 9950 was nominated to the DSL in 1997 for its use in the production of food products. Responses to a 2007 voluntary questionnaire sent to a subset of key biotechnology companies in Canada, combined with information obtained from other federal government regulatory and non-regulatory programs, did not indicate that C. utilisATCC 9950 was imported into Canada in the 2006 calendar year.
The Government conducted a mandatory information-gathering survey under section 71 of CEPA (hereafter rferred to as the section 71 Notice), as published in the Canada Gazette Part I on October 3, 2009. The section 71 Notice applied to any persons who, during the 2008 calendar year, manufactured or imported C. utilis ATCC 9950, whether alone, in a mixture, or in a product. Responses to the section 71 Notice indicate that approximately 80 metric tonnes of C. utilisATCC 9950 (viability, formulation and concentration unknown) were imported into Canada for the production and processing of food during the 2008 reporting year. C. utilis used as a flavour enhancer or dietary supplement is commonly in inactive form (non-living). Although the section 71 Notice was intended to gather information about living organisms, it seems likely (given the uses and quantities reported) that the respondents may have included inactive C. utilis ATCC 9950 in their responses to the survey. The exposure assessment will only consider exposure to living C. utilis ATCC 9950.
As mentioned in sections 1.2.4 and 1.3.1, C. utilis has properties that allow it to act as a potential biocontrol agent, to be used in fish and animal feed, and as a growth promoter in animals (i.e. probiotic, supplement). Similarly, C. utilisATCC 9950 and other naturally-occurring strains of C. utilis have been widely used in the food industry since the mid-1940s, particularly as a flavouring agent in processed foods (inactive form) and as probiotics (Kurtzman et al. 1979). These products are commonly marketed as Dried Torula Yeast, Torula Yeast, or Yeast Torula. A few representative examples are listed below:
- autolyzed yeast or inactive dried yeast for processing and production (emulsification, texture and flavour enhancement) of beverages and food (Product Sheets, 2014a – d)
- inactive dried yeast as a component of human dietary supplements (Product Sheets, 2014e, g-h).
- active yeast in probiotics (Product Sheets, 2014f).
A search of the public domain indicates that other naturally-occurring strains of C. utilis are mainly used as production organisms for the following:
- industrial biochemicals such as 4-hydroxybutyrate, 1,4-butanediol, L-phenylacetylcarbinol, and invertase (Belcarz et al. 2002; Khan and Daugulis, 2010; Pharkya et al. 2014)
- cosmetic or pharmaceutical ingredients such as glutathione (Product Sheet, 2014i), lactic acid (Ikushima et al. 2010) and glucomannan (Ruszova et al. 2008)
- bioethanol (Domenech et al. 1999).
Other potential uses identified from the literature and from patent submissions include, but are not limited to:
- reduction of biological oxygen demand and lactic acid in waste effluents from food processing, alcoholic distillation, and pulp and paper processing (Gold et al. 1981; Hang, 1980; Lemmel et al. 1979; Oliva and Hang, 1979; Razif et al. 2006; SivaRaman et al. 1984; Stevenson et al. 1979)
- wood processing and sugar production (Chesonis and Horton, 2014)
- bioremediation of aflatoxins (El-Shiekh et al. 2007)
- removal of gaseous ethanol in biofilters (Christen et al. 2002)
- degradation of crude petroleum (Nwachukwu, 2000).
According to the Material Safety Data Sheets for some of the aforementioned uses, C. utilis is packaged as fine powder, pellets, flakes or pills.
2.2 Exposure characterization
The environmental exposure for C. utilis ATCC 9950 is estimated to be low to medium based on responses to the section 71 Notice in which reported uses were limited to use in human food production and processing.
C. utilis is metabolically versatile and is expected to readily adapt to various environments. It has been isolated from soil, water, air, and waste and wastewater under different conditions. As demonstrated in the persistence study commissioned by Environment Canada, C. utilis ATCC 9950 in microcosm soil can be detected for up to 42 days.
Exposure of terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates and vertebrates to viable C. utilis ATCC 9950 is expected to be greatest through the consumption of livestock probiotics used in agriculture and aquaculture. Residual C. utilisATCC 9950 in soil and other surfaces from feed preparation could also result in dermal exposure to terrestrial vertebrates. Given that the livestock and aquaculture feeds are generally prepared using the inactive form of the yeast, exposure to live C. utilisATCC 9950 through these sources is considered low.
Indirect exposure of environmental species to C. utilisATCC 9950 through disposal of food wastes in municipal landfills or sewers is considered relatively insignificant given that the majority of foods containing C. utilis ATCC 9950 will likely contain the inactive form of the yeast.
The following exposure scenarios are based on potential uses of other C. utilis strains as described in Section 2.1 Sources of exposure. Uses, such as bioremediation and disposal of solid wastes from manufacturing facilities, are likely to introduce C. utilis ATCC 9950 to terrestrial ecosystems. Terrestrial invertebrates living in the soils at the site of application or disposal and plants growing in treated soils are likely to be the most directly exposed. Vertebrates could ingest C. utilis ATCC 9950 while feeding on plants or invertebrates growing in treated or contaminated soils.
Aquatic species may come into contact with C. utilisATCC 9950 from runoff subsequent to terrestrial application or disposal of wastewater from facilities that use the organism for production of enzymes and biochemicals. Nonetheless, the release of C. utilis ATCC 9950 from these facilities is expected to be limited by the application of good manufacturing practices, in which measures should be taken to minimize the release of production micro-organisms. Also, the extent of exposure will depend on the mass or volume released, on the receiving environment, and on the proximity of environmental species to the sites of application or disposal.
Based on commercial activity in Canada according to the section 71 Notice, and the considerations outlined below, the overall human exposure estimation for C. utilis ATCC 9950 is low.
Direct human exposure to live C. utilis ATCC 9950 is greatest through the consumption of dietary supplements or probiotics containing viable yeasts. Handling of food products containing C. utilis ATCC 9950 could result in skin and inhalation exposures; however, given that these food products are generally prepared using the inactive form of the yeast, exposure to viable C. utilis ATCC 9950 through these routes is considered relatively low.
Should other potential uses of C. utilis ATCC 9950 be realized in Canada, humans could be more exposed to C. utilisATCC 9950 in the environment subsequent to its use in wastewater treatment, bioremediation, or from disposal of waste generated during the production of enzymes and biochemicals. The extent of this exposure would depend on the mode of use, the mass or volume applied, and proximity to the application or disposal site. Such exposures may be temporally distant from the time of release and are expected to be significantly lower relative to exposure to live yeasts in dietary supplements and probiotics. Furthermore, uses for enzyme and biochemical production in manufacturing facilities that do not release wastes into the environment should not result in human exposure.
In the event that the organism enters municipal drinking water treatment systems (through release from potential uses and from wastewater), treatment processes which include coagulation, flocculation, ozonation, filtration and chlorination are expected to effectively eliminate C. utilis ATCC 9950 from drinking water.
3. Risk Characterization
In this assessment, risk is characterized according to a paradigm whereby a hazard and exposure to that hazard are both required for there to be a risk. The risk assessment conclusion is based on the hazard and on what is known about exposure from current uses.
Hazard has been estimated for C. utilis ATCC 9950 to be low for both the environment and for human health. Based on responses to the section 71 Notice, the exposure to living C. utilisATCC 9950 from its use in industrial processes, and consumer or commercial applications in Canada is expected to be low to medium for both the environment and human health.
Owing to the low potential for hazard, the overall risk associated with current uses is estimated to be low for both the environment and human health.
The determination of risk from current uses is followed by consideration of the estimated hazard in relation to foreseeable future exposures (from new uses).
C. utilis ATCC 9950 has useful properties that make it of interest for use in bioremediation, and for the production of biochemicals. These uses could increase environmental and human exposure of this strain in the future. The risk from reasonably foreseeable uses of C. utilisATCC 9950 remains low given that there is no evidence of adverse effects to human health or of adverse ecological effects at the population level for environmental species. This conclusion is also supported by the long history of safe use of C. utilis in industrial, environmental, and commercial settings.
Based on the information presented in this screening assessment, it is concluded that C. utilis ATCC 9950 is not entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that:
- have or may have an immediate or long-term harmful effect in the environment or its biological diversity;
- constitute or may constitute a danger to the environment on which life depends; or
- constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or health.
Therfore, it is concluded that this substance does not meet the criteria as set out in section 64 of the CEPA.
Abdelkarim, M. Kamel, C. Fathi, K. and Amina, B. (2010). Use of Pseudomonas stutzeri and Candida utilis in the improvement of the conditions of Artemia culture and protection against pathogens. Braz. J. Microbiol. 41, 107-115.
Ahearn, D. Roth Jr, F. and Meyers, S. (1968). Ecology and characterization of yeasts from aquatic regions of South Florida. Mar. Biol. 1, 291-308.
Ahmad, M.F. Haydar, S. and Quraishi, T.A. (2013). Enhancement of biosorption of zinc ions from aqueous solution by immobilized Candida utilis and Candida tropicalis cells. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 83, 119-128.
Al Akeel, R.A. El Kersh, T.A. Al Sheikh, Y.A. and Al Ahmadey, Z.Z. (2013). Prevalence and comparison for detection methods of Candida species in vaginal specimens from pregnant and non pregnant Saudi women. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 7, 56-65.
Albrecht, A. Felk, A. Pichova, I. Naglik, J.R. Schaller, M. de Groot, P. Maccallum, D. Odds, F.C. Schafer, W. Klis, F. Monod, M. and Hube, B. (2006). Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteases of Candida albicans target proteins necessary for both cellular processes and host-pathogen interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 688-694.
Al-Hafedh, Y.S. and Alam, A. (2013). Replacement of fishmeal by single cell protein derived from yeast grown on date (Phoenix dactylifera) industry waste in the diet of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. J. Appl. Aquac. 25, 346-358.
Alkatan, H. Athmanathan, S. and Canites, C.C. (2012). Incidence and microbiological profile of mycotic keratitis in a tertiary care eye hospital: A retrospective analysis. Saudi J. Ophthalmol. 26, 217-221.
Al-Mailem, D. Sorkhoh, N. Marafie, M. Al-Awadhi, H. Eliyas, M. and Radwan, S. (2010). Oil phytoremediation potential of hypersaline coasts of the Arabian Gulf using rhizosphere technology. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 5786-5792.
Alsina, A. Mason, M. Uphoff, R.A. Riggsby, W.S. Becker, J.M. and Murphy, D. (1988). Catheter-associated Candida utilisfungemia in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: species verification with a molecular probe. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26, 621-624.
Antunes, J. and Aguiar, C. (2012). Search for killer phenotypes with potential for biological control. Ann. Microbiol. 62, 427-433.
Arotupin, D.J. (2007). Evaluation of microorganisms from cassava waste water for production of amylase and cellulase. Res. J. Microbiol. 2, 475-480.
Atuanya, E.I. and Oseghe, E.O. (2006). Lead contamination and microbial lead tolerance in soils at major road junctions in Benin City. J. Appl. Sci. Env. Manag. 10, 99-104.
Barnett, J.A. (2004). A history of research on yeasts 8: Taxonomy. Yeast 21, 1141-1193.
Barnett, J.A. Payne, R.W. and Yarrow, D. (2000). Yeasts: characteristics and identification (Cambridge, U.K. ; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press).
Barrett-Bee, K. Hayes, Y. Wilson, R.G. and Ryley, J.F. (1985). A comparison of phospholipase activity, cellular adherence and pathogenicity of yeasts. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131, e1217.
Belcarz, A. Ginalska, G. Lobarzewski, J. and Penel, C. (2002). The novel non-glycosylated invertase from Candida utilis(the properties and the conditions of production and purification). BBA-Protein Struct. M.1594, 40-53.
Bennett, R.J. and Johnson, A.D. (2003). Completion of a parasexual cycle in Candida albicans by induced chromosome loss in tetraploid strains. EMBO J. 22, 2505–2515.
Biedunkiewicz, A. Dynowska, M. Ejdys, E. and Sucharzewska, E. (2013). Species diversity of yeast-like fungi in some eutrophic lakes in Olsztyn. Acta Mycol. 48, 61-71.
Biedunkiewicz, A. and Ejdys, E. (2011). Icicles as carriers of yeast-like fungi potentially pathogenic to human. Aerobiologia 27, 333-337.
Biedunkiewicz, A. and Ozimek, T. (2009). Qualitative and quantitative changes of potentially pathogenic fungi in a hydrophyte wastewater treatment plant. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 18, 161-166.
Blazejak, S. Duszkiewicz-Reinhard, W. Gniewosz, M. and Wiatrzyk, P. (2008). Impact of magnesium and mannose in the cultivation media on the magnesium biosorption, the biomass yield and on the cell wall structure of Candida utilis yeast. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 227, 695-700.
Botterel, F. Desterke, C. Costa, C. and Bretagne, S. (2001). Analysis of microsatellite markers of Candida albicansused for rapid typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 4076-4081.
Bougnoux, M. Aanensen, D.M. Morand, S. Théraud, M. Spratt, B.G. and d'Enfert, C. (2004). Multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans: strategies, data exchange and applications. Infect. Genet. Evol. 4, 243-252.
Bougnoux, M.-. Gueho, E. and Potocka, A.-. (1993). Resolutive Candida utilis fungemia in a nonneutropenic patient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31, 1644-1645.
Brown, M.R. Barrett, S.M. Volkman, J.K. Nearhos, S.P. Nell, J.A. and Allan, G.L. (1996). Biochemical composition of new yeasts and bacteria evaluated as food for bivalve aquaculture. Aquaculture 143, 341-360.
Buck, J.D. (1977). Comparison of in situ and in-vitro survival of Candida albicans in seawater. Microb. Ecol. 4, 291-302.
Buck, J.D. and Bubucis, P.M. (1978). Membrane filter procedure for enumeration of Candida albicans in natural waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35, 237-242.
Buerth, C. Heilmann, C.J. Klis, F.M. de Koster, C.G. Ernst, J.F. and Tielker, D. (2011). Growth-dependent secretome of Candida utilis. Microbiology+ 157, 2493-2503.
Butler, G. Rasmussen, M.D. Lin, M.F. Santos, M.A. Sakthikumar, S. Munro, C.A. Rheinbay, E. Grabherr, M. Forche, A. and Reedy, J.L. (2009). Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 459, 657-662.
CBS-KNAW. (2014). CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Center Database. CBS 5609 Strain Information. http://www.cbs.knaw.nl/Collections/BioloMICS.aspx?Table=CBS%20strain%20database&Rec=2440&Fields=All (viewed June 2014).
CFIA. (2014). Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Feeds Regulations 1983 (SORS/83-539). http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-83-593/page-17.html (viewed March 2014).
Chakravorty, M. Veiga, L.A. Bacila, M. and Horecker, B.L. (1962). Pentose metabolism in Candida. II. The diphosphopyridine nucleotide-specific polyol dehydrogenase of Candida utilis. J. Biol. Chem. 237, 1014-1020.
Chang, F.H. (1985). Effects of some environmental factors on growth characteristics of Candida utilis on peat hydrolysates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 54-60.
Chen, Y.C. Eisner, J.D. Kattar, M.M. Rassoulian-Barrett, S.L. LaFe, K. Yarfitz, S.L. Limaye, A.P. and Cookson, B.T. (2000). Identification of medically important yeasts using PCR-based detection of DNA sequence polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacer 2 region of the rRNA genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38,2302-2310.
Chesonis, A. and Horton, J.W. (2014). Integrated wood processing and sugar production. US 20140038244 A1.
Christen, P. Domenech, F. Michelena, G. Auria, R. and Revah, S. (2002). Biofiltration of volatile ethanol using sugar cane bagasse inoculated with Candida utilis. J. Hazard. Mater. 89, 253-265.
Ciardo, D.E. Schär, G. Böttger, E.C. Altwegg, M. and Bosshard, P.P. (2006). Internal transcribed spacer sequencing versus biochemical profiling for identification of medically important yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 77-84.
Cohen, J.M. Ross, M.W. and Busschers, E. (2008). Diagnosis and management of Candida utilis infectious arthritis in a Standardbred filly. Equine Vet.Educ. 20, 348-352.
Cook, W.L. and Schlitzer, R.L. (1981). Isolation of Candida albicans from freshwater and sewage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41, 840-842.
Costa, E. Gandra, C. Pires, M. Coutinho, S. Castilho, W. and Teixeira, C. (1993). Survey of bovine mycotic mastitis in dairy herds in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Mycopathologia 124, 13-17.
Cremer, J. Vatou, V. and Braveny, I. (1999). 2, 4-(Hydroxyphenyl)-ethanol, an antioxidative agent produced by Candida spp. impairs neutrophilic yeast killing in vitro. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170, 319-325.
Davis, D. (2003). Adaptation to environmental pH in Candida albicans and its relation to pathogenesis. Curr. Genet. 44, 1-7.
Dekeyser, S. Desmettre, T. Scala, L. Dufossez, M.-. Belletante, D. and Descamps, D. (2003). Candida utilis fungemia in an intensive care patient, resistant to treatment with fluconazol. Med. Mal. Infect. 33, 221-223.
Domenech, F. Christen, P. Paca, J. and Revah, S. (1999). Ethanol utilization for metabolite production by Candida utilisstrains in liquid medium. Acta Biotechnologica 19,27-36.
Dorko, E. and Pilipcinec, E. (2002). Candida l urinary tract infections caused by non-albicans Candida species. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 47, 182-184.
Dorko, E. Kmeťová, M. Pilipcinec, E. Bracoková, I. Dorko, F. Danko, J. Švický, E. and Tkáciková, L. (2000). Rare non-albicans Candida species detected in different clinical diagnoses. Folia Microbiol. 45, 364-368.
dos Santos, R.C. and Marin, J.M. (2005). Isolation of Candida spp. from mastitic bovine milk in Brazil. Mycopathologia 159, 251-253.
Elie, C.M. Lott, T.J. Reiss, E. and Morrison, C.J. (1998). Rapid identification of Candida species with species-specific DNA probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36, 3260-3265.
El-Shiekh, H.H. Mahdy, H.M. and El-Aaser, M.M. (2007). Bioremediation of aflatoxins by some rference fungal strains. Pol. J. Microbiol. 56, 215-223.
Enache-Angoulvant, A. Bourget, M. Brisse, S. Stockman-Pannier, C. Diancourt, L. Francois, N. Rimek, D. Fairhead, C. Poulain, D. and Hennequin, C. (2010). Multilocus microsatellite markers for molecular typing of Candida glabrata: application to analysis of genetic relationships between bloodstream and digestive system isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 4028-4034.
Environment Canada, and Health Canada. (2011). Framework on the Science-Based Risk Assessment of Micro-organisms under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. http://www.ec.gc.ca/subsnouvelles-newsubs/default.asp?lang=En&n=120842D5-1.
Eom, S. Lee, D. Kang, Y.M. Son, K. Jeon, Y. and Kim, Y. (2013). Application of yeast Candida utilis to ferment Eisenia bicyclis for enhanced antibacterial effect. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 171, 569-582.
Epifanio, C.E. (1979). Comparison of yeast and algal diets for bivalve molluscs. Aquaculture 16, 187-192.
Failla, M.L. Benedict, C.D. and Weinberg, E.D. (1976). Accumulation and storage of Zn2+ by Candida utilis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 94, 23-36.
Farnsworth, R.J. and Sorensen, D.K. (1972). Prevalence and species distribution of yeast in mammary glands of dairy cows in Minnesota. Can. J. Comp. Med. 36, 329-332.
Fencl, Z. Tlaskalová-Hogenová, H. Machek, F. Kováru, F. Cerna, J. and Šillinger, V. (1982). Immunological changes after long-term feeding of germfree piglets with protein isolates and yeast cell walls from Candida utilis as food additives. Folia Microbiol 27, 350-353.
Finkel, J.S. and Mitchell, A.P. (2010). Genetic control of Candida albicans biofilm development. Nature Reviews Microbiology 9, 109-118.
Fleck, R. Dietz, A. and Hof, H. (2007). In vitro susceptibility of Candida species to five antifungal agents in a German university hospital assessed by the rference broth microdilution method and Etest. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59, 767-771.
Franz, R. Kelly, S.L. Lamb, D.C. Kelly, D.E. Ruhnke, M. and Morschhauser, J. (1998). Multiple molecular mechanisms contribute to a stepwise development of fluconazole resistance in clinical Candida albicans strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 3065-3072.
Franzblau, S.G. and Sinclair, N.A. (1983). Induction of fermentation in Crabtree-negative yeasts. Mycopathologia 82, 185-190.
Fricker-Hidalgo, H. Orenga, S. Lebeau, B. Pelloux, H. Brenier-Pinchart, M.P. Ambroise-Thomas, P. and Grillot, R. (2001). Evaluation of Candida ID, a new chromogenic medium for fungal isolation and preliminary identification of some yeast species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 1647-1649.
Fujino, S. Akiyama, D. Akaboshi, S. Fujita, T. Watanabe, Y. and Tamai, Y. (2006) Purification and characterization of phospholipase B from Candida utilis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 70, 377-386.
Gaggìa, F. Baffoni, L. Di Gioia, D. Accorsi, M. Bosi, S. Marotti, I. Biavati, B. and Dinelli, G. (2013). Inoculation with microorganisms of Lolium perenne L.: evaluation of plant growth parameters and endophytic colonization of roots. New Biotechnol. 30, 695-704.
Garcia-Hermoso, D. MacCallum, D.M. Lott, T.J. Sampaio, P. Serna, M.J. Grenouillet, F. Klaassen, C.H. and Bretagne, S. (2010). Multicenter collaborative study for standardization of Candida albicans genotyping using a polymorphic microsatellite marker. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 2578-2581.
Gold, D. Mohagheghi, A. Cooney, C.L. and Wang, D.I. (1981). Single-cell protein production from spent sulfite liquor utilizing cell-recycle and computer monitoring. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23, 2105-2116.
González, G.M. Elizondo, M. and Ayala, J. (2008). Trends in species distribution and susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida collected in Monterrey, Mexico, to seven antifungal agents: Results of a 3-year (2004 to 2007) surveillance study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 2902-2905.
Grammes, F. Reveco, F.E. Romarheim, O.H. Landsverk, T. Mydland, L.T. and Øverland, M. (2013). Candida utilis and Chlorella vulgaris counteract intestinal inflammation in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.). PloS One 8, e83213.
Gropp, K. Schild, L. Schindler, S. Hube, B. Zipfel, P.F. and Skerka, C. (2009). The yeast Candida albicans evades human complement attack by secretion of aspartic proteases. Mol. Immunol. 47, 465-475.
Gupta, A.K. Ahmad, I. and Summerbell, R.C. (2002). Fungicidal activities of commonly used disinfectants and antifungal pharmaceutical spray preparations against clinical strains of Aspergillus and Candida species. Med. Mycol. 40, 201-208.
Hang, Y.D. (1980). Assimilation of lemonade-processing wastewater by yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39, 470-472.
Hata, D.J. Hall, L. Fothergill, A.W. Larone, D.H. and Wengenack, N.L. (2007). Multicenter evaluation of the new VITEK 2 advanced colorimetric yeast identification card. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 1087-1092.
Hazen, K.C. Theisz, G.W. and Howell, S.A. (1999). Chronic urinary tract infection due to Candida utilis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 824-827.
Health Canada (2015). Natural Health Products Ingredients Database – Dried Torula Yeast. http://webprod.hc-sc.gc.ca/nhpid-bdipsn/ingredReq.do?id=12547&lang=eng (viewed February 2015)
Hecht, T. and Viljoen, J. (1982). Observations on the suitability of various dry feeds for the commercial rearing of carp, Cyprinus carpio larvae in South Africa. Water SA 8, 58-65.
Heilmann, C.J. Sorgo, A.G. Siliakus, A.R. Dekker, H.L. Brul, S. de Koster, C.G. de Koning, L.J. and Klis, F.M. (2011). Hyphal induction in the human fungal pathogen Candida albicansreveals a characteristic wall protein profile. Microbiology 157, 2297-2307.
Helmerhorst, E.J. Venuleo, C. Sanglard, D. and Oppenheim, F.G. (2006). Roles of cellular respiration, CgCDR1, and CgCDR2 in Candida glabrata resistance to histatin 5. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 1100-1103.
Hepworth, L. (2012). A look into equine septic arthritis. Purdue University Indiana Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory. Fall 2012 Newsletter. https://www.addl.purdue.edu/Newsletters/2012/Fall/Arthritis.aspx (viewed April 2014).
Holzschu, D.L. Chandler, F.W. Ajello, L. and Ahearn, D.G. (1979). Evaluation of industrial yeasts for pathogenicity. Sabouraudia J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 17, 71-78.
Hoyer, L.L. (2001). The ALS gene family of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 9, 176-180.
Hube, B. and Naglik, J. (2001). Candida albicansproteinases: resolving the mystery of a gene family. Microbiology 147, 1997-2005.
Ibrahim, A.S. Magee, B.B. Sheppard, D.C. Yang, M. Kauffman, S. Becker, J. Edwards, J.E.Jr, and Magee, P.T. (2005). Effects of ploidy and mating type on virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 73, 7366-7374.
Ibrahim, A.S. Mirbod, F. Filler, S.G. Banno, Y. Cole, G.T. Kitajima, Y. Edwards, J.E.Jr, Nozawa, Y. and Ghannoum, M.A. (1995). Evidence implicating phospholipase as a virulence factor of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 63,1993-1998.
Ignatova E.A. Nagornaia S.S. Sudenko V.I. Podgorskiĭ V.S. (2002). [On the identity of Candida utilis and Pichia jadinii yeast species]. Mikrobiol Z. 6(1), 20-6.
Ikushima, S. Fujii, T. and Kobayashi, O. (2009). Efficient gene disruption in the high-ploidy yeast Candida utilis using the Cre-loxP system. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 73, 879-884.
Ikushima, S. Fujii, T. Kobayashi, O. and Ashigai, H. (2010). Method for highly efficient production of lactic acid using Candida utilis. CA Patent 2761724 A1.
Jones, J. and Schmitt, J. (1978). The effect of chlorination on the survival of cells of Candida albicans. Mycologia 684-689.
Kaliterna, J. Weusthuis, R.A. Castrillo, J.I. Van Dijken, J.P. and Pronk, J.T. (1995). Transient responses of Candida utilis to oxygen limitation: regulation of the Kluyver effect for maltose. Yeast 11, 317-325.
Katila, M.L. Mantyjarvi, R.A. and Ojanen, T.H. (1981). Sensitisation against environmental antigens and respiratory symptoms in swine workers. Br. J. Ind. Med. 38, 334-338.
Keyhani, E. Khavari-Nejad, S. Keyhani, J. and Attar, F. (2009). Acriflavine-mediated apoptosis and necrosis in yeast Candida utilis. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1171, 284-291.
Khan, T.R. and Daugulis, A.J. (2010). Application of solid-liquid TPPBs to the production of L-phenylacetylcarbinol from benzaldehyde using Candida utilis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 107, 633-641.
Kinneberg, K.M. Bendel, C.M. Jechorek, R.P. Cebelinski, E.A. Gale, C.A. Berman, J.G. Erlandsen, S.L. Hostetter, M.K. and Wells, C.L. (1999). Effect of INT1 gene on Candida albicans murine intestinal colonization. J. Surg. Res. 87, 245-251.
Koivikko, A. Kalimo, K. Nieminen, E. Savolainen, J. Viljanen, M. and Viander, M. (1988). Allergenic cross-reactivity of yeasts. Allergy 43, 192-200.
Kondo, K. Saito, T. Kajiwara, S. Takagi, M. and Misawa, N. (1995). A transformation system for the yeast Candida utilis: Use of a modified endogenous ribosomal protein gene as a drug-resistant marker and ribosomal DNA as an integration target for vector DNA. J. Bacteriol. 177, 7171-7177.
Kong, Y. Xu, X. Zhu, L. and Miao, L. (2013). Control of the harmful alga Microcystis aeruginosa and absorption of nitrogen and phosphorus by Candida utilis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 169, 88-99.
Kujan, P. Prell, A. Šafář, H. Sobotka, M. Řezanka, T. and Holler, P. (2006). Use of the industrial yeast Candida utilis for cadmium sorption. Folia Microbiol. 51, 257-260.
Kurtzman, C.P. (1988). Chapter 5: Identification and Taxonomy. In: Yeasts – (Living resources for biotechnology). Kirsop, B.E. and Kurtzman, C.P. Eds. Cambridge University Press. NY.
Kurtzman, C.P. Johnson, C.J. and Smiley, M.J. (1979). Determination of conspecificity of Candida utilis and Hansenula jadinii through DNA reassociation. Mycologia 11, 844-847.
L'Ollivier, C. Labruère, C. Jebrane, A. Bougnoux, M. d'Enfert, C. Bonnin, A. and Dalle, F. (2012). Using a Multi-Locus Microsatellite Typing method improved phylogenetic distribution of Candida albicans isolates but failed to demonstrate association of some genotype with the commensal or clinical origin of the isolates. Infect. Genet. Evol. 12, 1949-1957.
Laín, A. Elguezabal, N. Brena, S. García-Ruiz, J.C. del Palacio, A. Moragues, M.D. Pontón, J. (2007). Diagnosis of invasive candidiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the N-terminal fragment of Candida albicans hyphal wall protein I. BMC Microbiol. 7, e35
Lapena, M.A. Vicente-Soler, J. Soto, T. Madrid, M. Nunez, A. Garcia, E. Cansado, J. and Gacto, M. (2006). Light-induced rhythmic changes in thermotolerance in stationary-phase cells of Candida utilis. Int. Microbiol. 9, 61-64.
Lee, B.-. and Kyun Kim, J. (2001). Production of Candida utilis biomass on molasses in different culture types. Aquacult. Eng. 25, 111-124.
Leidich, S.D. Ibrahim, A.S. Fu, Y. Koul, A. Jessup, C. Vitullo, J. Fonzi, W. Mirbod, F. Nakashima, S. Nozawa, Y. and Ghannoum, M.A. (1998). Cloning and disruption of caPLB1, a phospholipase B gene involved in the pathogenicity of Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26078-26086.
Lemmel, S.A. Heimsch, R.C. and Edwards, L.L. (1979). Optimizing the continuous production of Candida utilis and Saccharomycopsis fibuliger on potato processing wastewater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37, 227-232.
Liu, Y. and Filler, S.G. (2011). Candida albicans Als3, a multifunctional adhesin and invasin. Eukaryot. Cell. 10, 168-173.
Lorenz, M.C. and Fink, G.R. (2001). The glyoxylate cycle is required for fungal virulence. Nature 412, 83-86.
Lukic-Grlić, A. Mlinarić-Missoni, E. Škaric, I. Važic-Babić, V. and Svetec, I. (2011). Candida utilisCandidemia in neonatal patients. J. Med. Microbiol. 60, 838-841.
Luzzati, R. Cavinato, S. Giangreco, M. Granà, G. Centonze, S. Deiana, M.L. Biolo, G. and Barbone, F. (2013). Peripheral and total parenteral nutrition as the strongest risk factors for nosocomial Candidemia in elderly patients: a matched case–control study. Mycoses 56, 664-671.
Lyon, G.M. Karatela, S. Sunay, S. Adiri, Y. and CandidaSurveillance Study Investigators. (2010). Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates from the Candidasurveillance study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 1270-1275.
Mahyuddin, P. and Winugroho, M. (2010). Effect of combination of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisae Candida utilis) and herbs supplementation in finishing diet on carcass characteristics of beef cattle. J.Indones.
Trop. Anim. Agric. 35, 251-256.
Martin, A.M. Goddard, S. and Bemibster, P. (1993). Production of Candida utilis biomass as aquaculture feed. J. Sci. Food Agric. 61, 363-370.
Martinez, J. Nuñez, A. and Ojeda, D. Paper presented at Organic Fruit Conference 873.
McDonnell, G. and Russell, A.D. (1999). Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12, 147-179.
Mille, Y. Beney, L. and Gervais, P. (2005). Compared tolerance to osmotic stress in various microorganisms: Towards a survival prediction test. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 92, 479-484.
Mohawed, S.M. (1994). Assessment of microbiological quality of underground water of upper Egypt, Qena region. Egypt. J. Microbiol. 29, 183-192.
Montagna, M.T. Lovero, G. Borghi, E. Amato, G. Andreoni, S. Campion, L. Lo Cascio, G. Lombardi, G. Luzzaro, F. Manso, E. (2014). Candidemia in intensive care unit: a nationwide prospective observational survey (GISIA-3 study) and review of the European literature from 2000 through 2013. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 661-674.
Mora, L.M. Lezcano, P. Hidalgo, K. and Rodríguez, B. (2012). Torula yeast (Candida utilis) on distiller's vinasse in growing pig diets. Cuban J. Agric. Sci. 46, 63-65.
Muter, O. Lubinya, I. Millers, D. Grigorjeva, L. Ventinya, E. and Rapoport, A. (2002). Cr(VI) sorption by intact and dehydrated Candida utilis cells in the presence of other metals. Process Biochem. 38, 123-131.
Nadeem, S.G. Shafiq, A. Hakim, S.T. Anjum, Y. and Kazm, S.U. (2013). Effect of growth media, pH and temperature on yeast to hyphal transition in Candida albicans. Open J. Med. Microbiol. 3, 185-192.
Naglik, J. Albrecht, A. Bader, O. and Hube, B. (2004). Candida albicans proteinases and host/pathogen interactions. Cell. Microbiol. 6, 915-926.
Naglik, J.R. Challacombe, S.J. and Hube, B. (2003). Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases in virulence and pathogenesis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 400-28,
NCYC. (2014). National Collection of Yeast Cultures. NYCY 707 Lindnera jadinii Product Sheet. https://catalogue.ncyc.co.uk/lindnera-jadinii-707 (viewed January 2014).
Nell, J.A. (1985). Comparison of some single cell proteins in the diet of the Sydney rock oyster (Saccostrea commercialis). The Progressive Fish-Culturist 47,110-113.
Nell, J.A. Diemar, J.A. and Heasman, M.P. (1996). Food value of live yeasts and dry yeast-based diets fed to Sydney rock oyster Saccostrea commercialis spat. Aquaculture 145,235-243.
Nie, W. Wei, G. Du, G. Li, Y. and Chen, J. (2005). Enhanced intracellular glutathione synthesis and excretion capability of Candida utilis by using a low pH-stress strategy. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 40, 378-384.
Nie, X. Liu, X. Wang, H. and Chen, J. (2010). Deletion of EFG1 promotes Candida albicans opaque formation responding to pH via Rim101. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 42, 735-744.
Nobile, C.J. Schneider, H.A. Nett, J.E. Sheppard, D.C. Filler, S.G. Andes, D.R. and Mitchell, A.P. (2008). Complementary adhesin function in C. albicans biofilm formation. Curr. Biol. 18, 1017-1024.
Nwachukwu, S. (2000). Enhanced rehabilitation of tropical aquatic environments polluted with crude petroleum using Candida utilis. J. Environ. Biol. 21, 241-250.
Oberoi, J.K. Wattal, C. Goel, N. Raveendran, R. Datta, S. and Prasad, K. (2012). Non-albicans Candida species in blood stream infections in a tertiary care hospital at New Delhi, India. Indian J. Med. Res. 136, 997-1003.
Odds, F.C. Hanson, M.F. Davidson, A.D. Jacobsen, M.D. Wright, P. Whyte, J.A. Gow, N.A. and Jones, B.L. (2007). One year prospective survey of Candida bloodstream infections in Scotland. J. Med. Microbiol. 56, 1066-1075.
Odds, F.C. and Jacobsen, M.D. (2008). Multilocus sequence typing of pathogenic Candida species. Eukaryot. Cell. 7, 1075-1084.
Oliva, R.U. and Hang, Y.D. (1979). Continuous removal of lactic acid from wastewater by Candida utilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 38, 1027-1028.
Olvera-Novoa, M.A. Martínez-Palacios, C.A. and Olivera-Castillo, L. (2002). Utilization of torula yeast (Candida utilis) as a protein source in diets for tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus Peters) fry. Aquacult. Nutr. 8, 257-264.
Ordaz, L. Lopez, R. Melchy, O. and Torre, M. (2001). Effect of high-cell-density fermentation of Candida utilis on kinetic parameters and the shift to respiro-fermentative metabolism. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 57, 374-378.
Øverland, M. Karlsson, A. Mydland, L.T. Romarheim, O.H. and Skrede, A. (2013). Evaluation of Candida utilis, Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts as protein sources in diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 402-403, 1-7.
Pan, L. Yang, D. Shao, L. Li, W. Chen, G. and Liang, Z. (2009). Isolation of the oleaginous yeasts from the soil and studies of their lipid-producing capacities. Food Technol Biotechnol 47, 215-220.
Paulitsch, A. Weger, W. Ginter-Hanselmayer, G. Marth, E. and Buzina, W. (2006). A 5-year (2000-2004) epidemiological survey of Candida and non-Candida yeast species causing vulvovaginal candidiasis in Graz, Austria. Mycoses 49, 471.
Paulitsch, A.H. Willinger, B. Zsalatz, B. Stabentheiner, E. Marth, E. and Buzina, W. (2009). In-vivo Candida biofilms in scanning electron microscopy. Med. Mycol. 47, 690-696.
Peng, Y.S. Nasr, M.E. Marston, J.M. and Fang, Y. (1984). Digestion of torula yeast, Candida utilis, by the adult honeybee, Apis mellifera. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77, 627-632.
Pfaller, M. Neofytos, D. Diekema, D. Azie, N. Meier-Kriesche, H. Quan, S. and Horn, D. (2012). Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 3648 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH Alliance®) registry, 2004–2008. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 74, 323-331.
Pfaller, M.A. Moet, G.J. Messer, S.A. Jones, R.N. and Castanheira, M. (2011). Geographic variations in species distribution and echinocandin and azole antifungal resistance rates among Candida bloodstream infection isolates: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008 to 2009). J. Clin. Microbiol. 49, 396-399.
Pharkya, P. Burgard, A.P. Van Dien, S.J. Osterhout, R.E. Burk, M.J. Trawick, J.T. and Kuchinskas, B.S. (2014). Microorganisms and methods for production of 4-hydroxybutyrate, 1,4-butanediol and related compounds. US Patent 20140030779 A1.
Pisman, T. and Somova, L. (2003). Interaction of a mixed yeast culture in an "autotroph-heterotroph" system with a closed atmosphere cycle and spatially separated components. Adv.Space Res. 31, 1751-1756.
Prasad, R. De Wergifosse, P. Goffeau, A. and Balzi, E. (1995). Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel gene of Candida albicans, CDR1, conferring multiple resistance to drugs and antifungals. Curr. Genet. 27, 320-329.
Presterl, E. Daxböck, F. Graninger, W. and Willinger, B. (2007). Changing pattern of candidaemia 2001–2006 and use of antifungal therapy at the University Hospital of Vienna, Austria. Clin. Microbiol. Infec. 13, 1072-1076.
Product Sheet. (2014a). Agrisent Product Sheet for Inactive Torula Yeast. http://www.agrisent.com/index_files/Page624.htm (viewed May 2014).
Product Sheet. (2014b). Aliments ED Foods Product Sheet for Luda Original Cream Soup and Sauce Base. http://www.ed.ca/our-products/our-brands/luda-original/cream-soup-sauce-base-b5bd3edd.html (viewed May 2014).
Product Sheet. (2014c). Lallemand Product Data Sheet for Lake States Torula Yeast. http://www.bio-lallemand.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/PDSLakeState12_low.pdf (viewed May 2014).
Product Sheet. (2014d). Ohly Product Sheet for Autolyzed Torula Yeast. http://www.ohly.com/products-services/autolysed-yeast (viewed May 2014).
Product Sheet. (2014e). Hillestad Pharmaceuticals Product Sheet for Arise Vigor/Force Protein Energy Mixer. http://www.hillestadlabs.com/protein%20products.html (viewed May 2014).
Product Sheet. (2014f). Nature's Choice Product Sheet for Torula Yeast Probiotic. http://www.natureschoice.co.za/bio-friendly/seasonings/torula-yeast/ (viewed May 2014).
Product Sheet. (2014g). North American Herb and Spice Product Sheet for Purely B. http://www.northamericanherbandspice.com/product/purely-b-400-g-powder/ (viewed May 2014).
Product Sheet. (2014h). Phytovie Product Sheet for Gourmet Nutrition Torula Yeast. http://www.phytovie.ca/product/5239 (viewed May 2014).
Product Sheet. (2014i). Kohjin Life Sciences Co. Ltd. Product Sheet for HITHION YH-15. htps://www.kohjinls.com/en/business/hithionextract_yh.html (viewed May 2014).
Rahman, S.A. (1996). Evaluation of various diets for the optimum growth and survival of larvae of the penaeid prawn Penaeus japonicus Bate. Aquacult. Nutr. 2, 151-155.
Ramage, G. Bachmann, S. Patterson, T.F. Wickes, B.L. and Lopez-Ribot, J.L. (2002). Investigation of multidrug efflux pumps in relation to fluconazole resistance in Candida albicansbiofilms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49, 973-980.
Ramírez-Zavala, B. Reuß, O. Park, Y. Ohlsen, K. and Morschhäuser, J. (2008). Environmental induction of white–opaque switching in Candida albicans. PLoS Pathogens 4(6), e1000089.
Razif, M. Budiarti, V.E. and Mangkoedihardjo, S. (2006). Appropriate fermentation process for tapioca's wastewater in Indonesia. J. Appl. Sci. 6, 2846-2848.
Restaino, L. Frampton, E.W. Hemphill, J.B. and Palnikar, P. (1995). Efficacy of ozonated water against various food-related microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 3471-3475.
Ribeiro, I.C. Veríssimo, I. Moniz, L. Cardoso, H. Sousa, M.J. Soares, A.M.V.M. and Leão, C. (2000). Yeasts as a model for assessing the toxicity of the fungicides penconazol, cymoxanil and dichlofluanid. Chemosphere 41, 1637-1642.
Riggle, P.J. and Kumamoto, C.A. (2006). Transcriptional regulation of MDR1, encoding a drug efflux determinant, in fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains through an Mcm1p binding site. Eukaryot. Cell. 5, 1957-1968.
Rodríguez, B. Valdivié, M. Lezcano, P. and Herrera, M. (2013). Evaluation of torula yeast (Candida utilis) grown on distillery vinasse for broilers. Cuban J. Agric. Sci. 47,
Ruszova, E. Pavek, S. Hajkova, V. Jandova, S. Velebny, V. Papezikova, I. and Kubala, L. (2008). Photoprotective effects of glucomannan isolated from Candida utilis. Carbohydr. Res. 343, 501-511.
Sanglard, D. Ischer, F. Monod, M. and Bille, J. (1997). Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene. Microbiology 143 ( Pt 2), 405-416.
Savolainen, J. Kortekangas-Savolainen, O. Nermes, M. Viander, M. Koivikko, A. Kalimo, K. and Terho, E.O. (1998). IgE, IgA, and IgG responses to common yeasts in atopic patients. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 53, 506-512.
Schaller, M. Hube, B. Ollert, M.W. Schäfer, W. Borg-von Zepelin, M. Thoma-Greber, E. and Korting, H.C. (1999). In vivo expression and localization of Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases during oral candidiasis in HIV-infected patients. J. Invest. Dermatol. 112, 383-386.
Şeker, E. (2010). Identification of Candida species isolated from bovine mastitic milk and their in vitro hemolytic activity in Western Turkey. Mycopathologia 169, 303-308.
Sharma, N. Verma, U. and Awasthi, P. (2006). A combination of the yeast Candida utilis and chitosan controls fruit rot in tomato caused by Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler and Geotrichum candidum Link ex Pers. J.Hortic.Sci.Biotechnol. 81, 1052-1056.
Sheppard, D.C. Locas, M.C. Restieri, C. and Laverdiere, M. (2008). Utility of the germ tube test for direct identification of Candida albicans from positive blood culture bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 3508-3509.
Shih, M.H. Sheu, M.M. Chen, H.Y. and Lin, S.R. (1999). Fungal keratitis caused by Candida utilis--case report. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 15, 171-174.
Singh, A. Prasad, T. Kapoor, K. Mandal, A. Roth, M. Welti, R. and Prasad, R. (2010). Phospholipidome of Candida: Each species of Candida has distinctive phospholipid molecular species. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 14, 665-677.
SivaRaman, H. Pundle, A.V. and Prabhune, A.A. (1984). Growth of Candida utilis on distillery effluent. Biotechnol. Lett. 6, 759-762.
Siwicki, A.K. Anderson, D.P. and Rumsey, G.L. (1994). Dietary intake of immunostimulants by rainbow trout affects non-specific immunity and protection against furunculosis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 41, 125-139.
Song, X. Sun, J. Støre, G. Hansen, B.F. and Olsen, I. (2009). Colony morphologies, species, and biotypes of yeasts from thrush and denture stomatitis. Acta Odontol. Scand. 67, 248-255.
Spampinato, C. and Leonardi, D. (2013). Molecular fingerprints to identify Candida species. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 1-9.
Staab, J.F. Ferrer, C.A. and Sundstrom, P. (1996). Developmental expression of a tandemly repeated, proline-and glutamine-rich amino acid motif on hyphal surfaces on Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6298-6305.
Stevens, R.I. and Truog, J.R. (1957). Comparison of dried yeasts, Candida utilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as supplements in a diet for Rainbow Trout. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 86, 161-168.
Stevenson, K. Black, O. and Costilow, R. (1979). Aerobic fermentations of pickle process brine by Candida utilis. J. Food Sci. 44, 181-185.
Streit, J. Prior, B.A. and Kilian, S.G. (1987). Substrate utilization by yeast in a spent sulfite liquor permeate. Water SA (Pretoria) 13, 145-150.
Sudbery, P. (2011). Growth of Candida albicans hyphae. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 9, 737-748.
Sudbery, P. Gow, N. and Berman, J. (2004). The distinct morphogenic states of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 12(7), 317-324.
Sukorinia, H. Sangchote, S. and Khewkhomc, N. (2013). Control of postharvest green mold of citrus fruit with yeasts, medicinal plants, and their combination. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 79, 24-31.
Suzuki, M. and Nakase, T. (2002). A phylogenetic study of ubiquinone-7 species of the genus Candida based on 18S ribosomal DNA sequence divergence. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 48, 55-65.
Szyłak-Szydłowski, M. and Korniłłowicz-Kowalska, T. (2012). The mycobiota of landfill leachates in the pretreatment process in a sequencing batch reactor. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 7, 250-258.
Tavanti, A. Davidson, A.D. Gow, N.A. Maiden, M.C. and Odds, F.C. (2005). Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 284-292.
Tavanti, A. Gow, N.A. Senesi, S. Maiden, M.C. and Odds, F.C. (2003). Optimization and validation of multilocus sequence typing for Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 3765-3776.
Thewes, S. Moran, G.P. Magee, B.B. Schaller, M. Sullivan, D.J. and Hube, B. (2008). Phenotypic screening, transcriptional profiling, and comparative genomic analysis of an invasive and non-invasive strain of Candida albicans. BMC Microbiol. 8, 187-2180-8-187.
Tomita, Y. Ikeo, K. Tamakawa, H. Gojobori, T. and Ikushima, S. (2012). Genome and transcriptome analysis of the food-yeast Candida utilis. PLoS One 7, e37226.
Tortorano, A.M. Caspani, L. Rigoni, A.L. Biraghi, E. Sicignano, A. and Viviani, M.A. (2004). Candidosis in the intensive care unit: A 20-year survey. J. Hosp. Infect. 57, 8-13.
Turkylmaz, S. and Kaynarca, S. (2010). The slime production by yeasts isolated from subclinical mastitic cows. Acta Veterinaria Brno 79, 581-586.
Uetsuka, A. Satoh, S. Itoh, M. Okazaki, N. Ohno, Y. and Yoshimura, K. (1976). The tissue culture study of antifungal agents and their morphological changes on yeast and yeast-like fungi. In: Parasites, Fungi, and Viruses, Springer) pp. 157-163.
Urban Jr, E.R. and Langdon, C.J. (1984). Reduction in costs of diets for the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica(Gmelin), by the use of non-algal supplements. Aquaculture 38, 277-291.
U.S.D.A. ARS. (2014). United States Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Research Services Culture Collection (NRRL). http://nrrl.ncaur.usda.gov/cgi-bin/usda/yeast/report.html?nrrlcodes=Y-900 (viewed March 2014).
U.S. FDA. (2013). United States Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Part 127: Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to Food for Human Consumption (21CFR172.896). (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=172.896 (viewed April 2014).
Verweij, P.E. van den Bergh, M.F. Rath, P.M. de Pauw, B.E. Voss, A. and Meis, J.F. (1999). Invasive aspergillosis caused by Aspergillus ustus: case report and review. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 1606-1609.
Visser, W. Scheffers, W.A. Batenburg-van der Vegte, W.H. and van Dijken, J.P. (1990). Oxygen requirements of yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 3785-3792.
Vraná, D. and Sobotka, M. (1989). Physiological changes of Candida utilis in transient state during continuous cultivation. Folia Microbiol 34, 30-36.
Vylkova, S. Carman, A.J. Danhof, H.A. Collette, J.R. Zhou, H. and Lorenz, M.C. (2011). The fungal pathogen Candida albicans autoinduces hyphal morphogenesis by raising extracellular pH. mBio. 2(3), 1-12.
Watts, J.L. (1988). Etiological agents of bovine mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 16, 41-66.
Wawron, W. Bochniarz, M. and Piech, T. (2010). Yeast mastitis in dairy cows in the middle-eastern part of Poland. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Puławy 54, 201-204.
Westwater, C. Balish, E. and Schofield, D.A. (2005). Candida albicans-conditioned medium protects yeast cells from oxidative stress: a possible link between quorum sensing and oxidative stress resistance. Eukaryot. Cell. 4, 1654-1661.
Weusthuis, R.A. Visser, W. Pronk, J.T. Scheffers, W.A. and van Dijken, J.P. (1994). Effects of oxygen limitation on sugar metabolism in yeasts: a continuous-culture study of the Kluyver effect. Microbiology 140 (Pt 4), 703-715.
Whiteway, M. and Bachewich, C. (2007). Morphogenesis in Candida albicans. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61, 529-553.
Wirsching, S. Michel, S. and Morschhäuser, J. (2000). Targeted gene disruption in Candida albicans wild-type strains: the role of the MDR1 gene in fluconazole resistance of clinical Candida albicans isolates. Mol. Microbiol. 36, 856-865.
Yamada, Y. Matsuda, M. and Mikata, K. (1995). The phylogenetic relationships of Pichia jadinii, formerly classified in the genus Hansenula, and related species based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Saccharomycetaceae). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 59, 518-520.
Yurong, Y. Ruiping, S. Shimin, Z. and Yibao, J. (2005). Effect of probiotics on intestinal mucosal immunity and ultrastructure of cecal tonsils of chickens. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 59, 237-246.
Zheng, S. Yang, M. Lv, W. and Liu, F. (2001). Study on sludge expansion during treatment of salad oil manufacturing wastewater by yeast. Environ. Technol. 22, 533-542.
Zhou, Y. Ren, Y. Fan, C. Shao, H. Zhang, Z. Mao, W. Wei, C. Ni, H. Zhu, Z. Hou, X. Piao, F. and Cui, Y. (2013). Survey of mycotic mastitis in dairy cows from Heilongjiang Province, China. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 45, 1709-1714.
Appendix A: Characterization C. utilisATCC9950
a) C. utilis ATCC9950Footnote 5
Long description for figure A-1
Figure A-1: This figure is a photomicrograph showing yeast cells and pseudohyphae of C. utilis ATCC 9950.
b) C. albicansSC5314
Long description for figure A-2
Figure A-2: The figure is a photomicrograph of C. albicans SC 5314 showing yeast cells, true hyphae and chlamycospores.
|Fetal Bovine Serum||+||+||~||-|
|Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (with FBS, glucose, glutamine)||~||~||-||-|
- Date modified: