Warning This Web page has been archived on the Web.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the Contact Us page.

Appendix 5: FSDS Performance Measurement Framework

Stream 1: Developing and Reporting on the FSDS
Immediate OutcomeInformation on FSDS activities and results is used by stakeholders
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
Annual number of print and internet-based publications of  the Canadian Environmental Sustainability IndicatorsCESI Web analytics
CESIWebsite hits
Interviews with selected stakeholders
Qualitative interviews with a selection of CESI / FSDSstakeholders (GOC, NGOs, other levels of government) to determine how data is used
Annual number of print and internet-based publications  using information from the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (or results from the Progress Report)FSDS web analytics
Internet search
FSDS  website hits
Interviews with selected stakeholders
Quantitative analysis of number of hits and downloads of CESI/FSDSmaterial by stakeholder and other CESI web analytics
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOAt least once every 3 years for each indicatorTarget will be set once a baseline value is measured (2011)2013 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 20112011
Immediate OutcomeIncreased ability to identify improvements to future FSDSs
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
# of issues revealed through CESDreport and SDAC comments on the FSDS Consultation Report that are addressed in the final FSDS.CESDreports, SDACcomments
on the FSDS Consultation Synthesis Report
The CESDand SDAC are required to review and comment on the draft FSDS Consultation Report. The SDOwill compile these recommendations and compare to what was included in the final FSDS and the Progress Report.
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOEvery 3 years (with adoption of new FSDS)50% adoption2013 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 20112011

 

Stream 2 : Measuring Performance
Logic Model ElementIncreased soundness and coverage of FSDSindicators
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
# of indicators provided by departments for the goals and targets in the FSDSthat meet indicator criteria for Themes I to III.FSDS Indicators for Themes I to IIIDetermine the % of indicators that meet the indicator criteria based on the Bellagio principles of policy relevance, utility, indicator soundness, data availability and cost-effectiveness.  As new data becomes available and/or new indicators are developed, assess changes to existing indicators and complete assessment of new indicators.
Bellagio principlesDefined as – indicators should be consistent and comparable over time and space, backed by credible science and methods.
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDO will conduct the initial evaluation 1-3. An independent evaluation by EC’s evaluation branch or by a consultant will be undertaken when feasibleAt least once every 3 years for each indicator. New indicators should be assessed once established.Target will be set once a baseline value is measured (2011)2013 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 20112011
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
% of targets with indicators in the GGOSupplementary Table that can be aggregated, to provide an assessment of the environmental footprint of federal operations.GGO Supplementary Table

Analysis of indicators GGO Supplementary Information Table.

Aggregation criteria to be developed.

ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
PWGSCAnnualTBD2014 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 20112010

 

Stream 3: DSDS(RPP/DPR)
Immediate OutcomeIncreased internal capability for integrated sustainable development planning and reporting
Capability is defined as knowledge and tools
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
% of participating departments reporting they have adequate capacity for integrated planning and reporting (i.e.  training and knowledge)A survey with Departmental / agency representatives identified by the SD leads
(Survey to be developed in 2011)

Short survey of departmental planners to be developed in 2011.  Questions such as: On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is not at all aware and 5 is fully aware,

  • How aware are you of TBS, PWGSC and EC FSDS guidance documents regarding the development of RPPs, DPRs and departmental websites? How clear are the guidance documents?
  • How useful was the guidance?
  • To what extent did you apply the guidance outlined in the guidance when developing your RPP, DPR and website?
  • Was EC/TBS/PWGSC helpful in providing additional support during the development of your RPP, DPR or website?
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOEvery 5 years (every second  FSDS)TBD once the baseline is established2013 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 2012Fall 2012
Immediate OutcomeIncreased provision of information on resources related to sustainable development activities and results
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
Extent to which  departments/agencies use the guidance requirements for producing RPPs, DPRs and departmental websitesFSDS Departments / agencies RPPs/DPRs (DSDS)
The criteria for meeting each of these levels will be developed in 2011.
Analysis of departmental and or agencies to document the degree to which each department/agency is using the guidance for the RPP, DPR and departmental website. i.e. on a scale of 1 to 5
1) did not use
2) partially used
3) mostly used
4) used completely
5) exceeds expectations
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOEvery 3 years to flow into the Progress ReportTBD once the baseline is established2013 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 2011 with publication of the first RPP and 2012 with the first DPR.2011 (RPP)
2012 (DPR)

 

Stream 4: Sustainable Development Practices
Immediate OutcomeIncreased  capability to use the FSDSin policy development
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
% of participating departments reporting they have increased capability to use the FSDS in policy developmentSurvey of  departments and agencies SD officesShort survey to departments to be developed in 2011.  Responses will be on a scale of 1 to 5:  1) very low, 2) low, 3) moderate, 4) high, 5) very high. 
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOEvery 5 years (every second  FSDS)TBD once the baseline is established2013 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 20112011
Immediate OutcomeIncreased capability to consider the impact policy decisions have on the environment
Capability is defined as knowledge and tools
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
% of participating departments reporting they have increased capability  to consider the impact policy decisions have on the environmentSDO will prepare a survey for departmentsShort survey to departments to be developed in 2011.  Responses will be on a scale of 1 to 5:  1) very low, 2) low, 3) moderate, 4) high, 5) very high. 
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOEvery 5 years (every second  FSDS)TBD once the baseline is established2013 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 20112011

 

Intermediate Outcomes
Intermediate OutcomeIncreased integration of SD into decisions made regarding the development of Government of Canada initiatives
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology

e.g. of possible indicators

  • Gaps are filled
  • Quality of goals, targets and implementation strategies
  • Increased transparency and accountability

FSDS meets international best practices

TBDTBD
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOTBDTBDTBDTBDTBD
Intermediate OutcomeIncreased integration of environmental considerations into social and economic decision-making.
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
Compliance with SEA guidance as reported by departments/agencies in their DPRs on their websitesAssessment of compliance as reported in DPRsDepartmental DPR Guidance suggests that departments report on the compliance rate with CEAA guidance specifically as it relates to the FSDS.
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOEvery 3 yearsTBD once the baseline is established2013 and ongoingBaseline to be established in 2012Fall 2012

 

Ultimate Outcome
Improved performance of federal sustainable development goals and targets
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
% CESIsustainable development indicators showing improvement on themes I to III in the FSDSResults achieved by CESIindicatorsReview data on CESIindicators compared to previous year
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
SDOEvery 3 years (with adoption of new FSDS)Performance on CESIindicators should show improvement over time2013 and ongoing2011 (or when indicator data is available)2011
Performance IndicatorData SourceDefinitions and Methodology
% of FSDS GGO targets that are on track to meet / have met target expectations or are on track to exceed / have exceeded target expectations (as per self-selected traffic light indicators).Greening Government Operations Table in Departmental Performance ReportsReview of traffic light indicators in the Greening Government Operations Supplementary Table.
ResponsibleFrequency of ReportingTarget ValueDate to Achieve TargetBaseline or Actual ValueDate of Baseline Measurement
PWGSCEach DPR100% in each fiscal year2011-12 and ongoingNot ApplicableNot Applicable